Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Oriol Roca Batalla Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Ficovich has a second serve points win rate of 44.76% over the past six months, compared to Batalla's slightly better rate of 45.63%. Is this minor difference predictive of match outcomes? Slightly, but it is a contributing factor.
• Return Game Effectiveness: Recently, Ficovich has captured 44.9% of his opponent's second-serve points while Batalla has a near-identical rate at 45.01%. For first serves, Ficovich is at 26.93%, just above Batalla's 26.86%. How does this compare? These stats suggest a balanced return game from both players.
• Under Pressure Performance: Ficovich has saved 51.99% of breakpoints, whereas Batalla has excelled with a 58.39% save rate. Does this make Batalla more resilient under pressure? It could be significant during tight games.
• Annual Match Success: Over the last year, Ficovich boasts a 56.25% win rate, superior to Batalla's 50%. Does this indicate better overall consistency? It suggests Ficovich may have a competitive edge.
• Surface Success: Both players perform best on clay, with Batalla slightly ahead at 62% win rate compared to Ficovich's 59%. Who fares better on hard surfaces? Batalla has struggled, whereas Ficovich has managed modest success, highlighting Batalla's harder surface weakness.
• Event Level Experience: Ficovich and Batalla have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tier events, with similar experience levels. Does this mean equivalent competitiveness? Their performance is closely matched at these levels.
• Opponent Quality: Ficovich has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 256.04 against Batalla’s 303.65. Does playing stronger opponents enhance skill? It might give Ficovich a sharpened competitive edge.
• Deciding Set Outcomes: Ficovich has won 50% of deciding sets, outperforming Batalla’s 30%. What does this reveal about endurance? Ficovich could be more reliable if the match goes the distance.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Ficovich has recently converted 30.37% of breakpoints, compared to Batalla’s 26.76%. How critical is this stat? It indicates Ficovich's higher efficiency in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):

In assessing recent trends and statistics, both players demonstrate closely matched technical skills, particularly in second serve and return effectiveness. However, Ficovich's slight edge in match win percentage over the past year suggests a more consistent performance.

Furthermore, Batalla exhibits resilience under breakpoint pressure, yet Ficovich shows greater competence in breakpoint conversion—potentially pivotal in tight match scenarios. Notably, Ficovich's experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests enhanced adaptability and competitive resilience.

Considering the balance of these factors, Ficovich's performance on clay and deciding set strength are noteworthy, coupled with his consistent ability to win in varying match circumstances. Accordingly, Ficovich is slightly favored to win the upcoming match.