Prediction of Josephine Cruickshank vs May Doeg Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Cruickshank vs M. Doeg
Josephine Cruickshank
USA
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
116
Age
109
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
May Doeg
USA
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
116
Age
109
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Cruickshank 3 - 0 Doeg
They have played 6 sets in total, with Josephine Cruickshank winning 6 and May Doeg winning 0. The last match between Josephine Cruickshank and May Doeg was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 14-09-1934, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Josephine Cruickshank getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cruickshank | 3 |
| Doeg | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R4) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-14-34)
Josephine Cruickshank
6
6
May Doeg
1
0
() Los Angeles SoCal Chps(05-08-33)
Josephine Cruickshank
7
6
May Doeg
5
1
(R4) Los Angeles SoCal Chps(05-10-30)
Josephine Cruickshank
6
6
May Doeg
1
1
J. Cruickshank vs M. Doeg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.29% (176-78) | Career Total W/L | 58.55% (89-63) |
| 3 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Cruickshank vs M. Doeg Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Josephine Cruickshank has won 0% of points on their second serve, while May Doeg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Josephine Cruickshank, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while May Doeg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Josephine Cruickshank has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas May Doeg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Josephine Cruickshank has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with May Doeg winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Josephine Cruickshank has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 71% (W/L 17/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/4). May Doeg has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 71% (W/L 22/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Josephine Cruickshank has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as May Doeg has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Josephine Cruickshank winning 3 times and May Doeg being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Josephine Cruickshank winning 6 and May Doeg winning 0.
- The last match between Josephine Cruickshank and May Doeg was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 14-09-1934, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Josephine Cruickshank getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Josephine Cruickshank has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while May Doeg has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Josephine Cruickshank has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while May Doeg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Josephine Cruickshank has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and May Doeg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Josephine Cruickshank vs May Doeg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Cruickshank vs M. Doeg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 37 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Cruickshank 0%, Doeg 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Cruickshank 0%, Doeg 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Cruickshank 0%, Doeg 0%.
J. Cruickshank Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Denver - 26-06-1939 | ||||
| Virginia WolfendenV. Wolfenden | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Los Angeles Motion Pictures - 22-05-1938 | ||||
F Gretl DupontG. Dupont | W | 6-2 1-0 RET | ||
| Palm Springs - 27-03-1936 | ||||
SF Carolin BabcockC. Babcock | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Los Angeles Pac Southwest - 13-09-1935 | ||||
R4  Freda JamesF. James | L | 8-6 6-2 | ||
R3 Louise MartinL. Martin | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
M. Doeg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del Monte - 28-03-1940 | ||||
R4 Barbara Tuttle LafayetteB. Tuttle | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Palm Springs - 11-01-1940 | ||||
R3 Catherine MalcolmC. Malcolm | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
 Los Angeles Mid-Winter - 16-12-1939 | ||||
R4 Gretl DupontG. Dupont | L | W/O | ||
| Pasadena - 30-11-1939 | ||||
R4  Unknown PlayerU. Player | L | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Los Angeles Pac Southwest - 22-09-1939 | ||||
R3 Katherine DanielsK. Daniels | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
J. Cruickshank vs M. Doeg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.29% (176/78) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.55% (89/63) |
| 67.30% (356/173) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.85% (188/137) |
| 100.00% (2772/0) | Games Win/Loss | 100.00% (1617/0) |
| 71.28% (67/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (54/42) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 68.99% (89/40) | Grass Win/Loss | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 69% (165/239) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (85/143) |
| 48% (24/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 92% (169/156) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (92/83) |
| 8% (169/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (92/9) |
| 13% (71/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (53/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionS. KozlovM. Cassone4W1
1.94
W2
1.75
03:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
G. L. Vela
B. Z. MirallesW1
2.16
W2
1.6
06:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionH. StewartL. BocchiW1
1.155
W2
4.5
03:30 PM 16/11/25
PredictionS. P. Contri
S. PalosiW1
2.22
W2
1.57
02:15 PM 16/11/25
PredictionI. L. MorilloC. L. MontagudW1
2.375
W2
1.5
02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
T. KumasakaALT
A. Bolt7W1
3.48
W2
1.25
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Carlos AlcarazJannik Sinner20:00
H2H 10-5
Maya Joint
Laura PigossiH2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal