Prediction of Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez vs Steven Jarman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Roman-Gomez vs S. Jarman

Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez

ESP

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Steven Jarman

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Roman-Gomez 1 - 0 Jarman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez winning 2 and Steven Jarman winning 1. The last match between Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez and Steven Jarman was at the Spain F38, 04-11-2013, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Roman-Gomez	1
Jarman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3) Spain F38(11-04-13)

Stats

Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez

Steven Jarman

J. Roman-Gomez vs S. Jarman H2H Profile

J. Roman-Gomez	Stats	S. Jarman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
38.46% (5-8)	Career Total W/L	28.57% (2-5)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Roman-Gomez vs S. Jarman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Steven Jarman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Steven Jarman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Steven Jarman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Steven Jarman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4). Steven Jarman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Steven Jarman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez winning 1 times and Steven Jarman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez winning 2 and Steven Jarman winning 1.
The last match between Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez and Steven Jarman was at the Spain F38, 04-11-2013, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Steven Jarman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Steven Jarman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Steven Jarman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jose-Manuel Roman-Gomez vs Steven Jarman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Roman-Gomez vs S. Jarman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Roman-Gomez	Stats	S. Jarman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
13	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Roman-Gomez Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Greece F1 - 23-03-2015
Q1 Krystof JanosikK. Janosik	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Spain F39 - 11-11-2013
Q2 Ivan Gomez MantillaI. Gomez	L	6-4 4-1 ret.	Stats
Spain F38 - 04-11-2013
R1 Jose Fco. Vidal AzorinJ. Fco.	L	2-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Steven JarmanS. Jarman	W	1-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Fabian CeuterickxF. Ceuterickx	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Jarman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Spain F38 - 04-11-2013
Q3 Jose-Manuel Roman-GomezJ. Roman-Gomez	L	1-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Jorge Blanco GuadalupeJ. Blanco	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Great Britain F21 - 14-10-2013
Q1 Alistair HobsonA. Hobson	W	3-6 6-3 7-6(5)	Stats
Q2 Ben MinskiB. Minski	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Great Britain F19 - 09-09-2013
Q1 Aneil PersadA. Persad	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Roman-Gomez vs S. Jarman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Roman-Gomez	Stats	S. Jarman
38.46% (5/8)	YTD Win/Loss	28.57% (2/5)
39.29% (11/17)	Sets Win/Loss	29.41% (5/12)
46.78% (109/124)	Games Win/Loss	40.94% (61/88)
33.33% (2/4)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
33.33% (1/2)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
50.00% (2/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (2/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
128.08	Average Opponent Rank	0
33.33% (1/2)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Futures W/L	28.57% (2/5)
38% (5/13)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	29% (2/7)
0% (0/2)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (2/3)
80% (5/4)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (1/0)
20% (5/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
13% (8/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	33% (6/2)