Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jose Statham vs Marcus Daniell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Statham vs Daniell analysis and find out who is favored!
Jose Statham vs Marcus Daniell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Statham has won 51.77% of points on his second serve, while Daniell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Statham, in recent form, has won 53.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Statham has saved 57.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Statham has won 38.64% of matches played (W/L 17/ 27), with Daniell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Daniell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.84% of matches (W/L 14/ 24), where as Daniell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Statham winning 5 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Statham winning 10 and Daniell winning 2. The last match between Statham and Daniell was at the Traralgon Challenger 2, 04-11-2014, First, Hard with Jose Statham getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:26:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Statham and Daniell have played a deciding set 2 times, with Statham winning 2 times and Daniell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Statham winning 2, and Daniell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Statham has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.59 while Daniell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Statham has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Statham has converted 46.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Statham 5 - 0 Daniell
663
Rank
279
High
36
Age
R
Plays
5
Total0
5
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
500
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (604-453)
Career Total W/L
48% (144-158)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$33,515
Career Prize Money
$4,155
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jose Statham | Marcus Daniell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 5 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 2 |
| Games Won | 69 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:26:51 | 0:26:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (64/98) | 63% (60/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (47/64) | 70% (42/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (34/95) | 32% (31/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jose Statham
Player
Marcus Daniell
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 6-1 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jose Statham | Marcus Daniell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (112/112) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 296.22 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (374/646) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (261/374) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (144/272) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (20/41) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (225/622) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Toshihide Matsui
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Jose Statham
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcus Daniell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Romain Jouan
Player
Marcus Daniell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Alexis Musialek
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Marcus Daniell
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannik Reuter
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Marcus Daniell
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-6(9) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Statham Vs Daniell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
