Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joris De Loore vs John Lamble Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loore vs Lamble analysis and find out who is favored!
Joris De Loore vs John Lamble Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loore has won 49.9% of points on his second serve, while Lamble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loore, in recent form, has won 41.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loore has saved 63.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loore has won 50% of matches played (W/L 27/ 27), with Lamble winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loore has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 115/ 53), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Lamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 135/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Loore has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.16% of matches (W/L 22/ 21), where as Lamble has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loore winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loore winning 2 and Lamble winning 0. The last match between Loore and Lamble was at the Aptos Challenger, 08-08-2017, First, Hard with Joris De Loore getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loore and Lamble have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loore winning 0 times and Lamble 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loore winning 0, and Lamble 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loore has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.85 while Lamble has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loore has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loore has converted 31.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loore 1 - 0 Lamble
208
Rank
142
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
781
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
65% (407-221)
Career Total W/L
58% (146-105)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$101,635
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Joris De Loore | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:1 | 1:12:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 49% (29/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (26/30) | 55% (16/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 47% (14/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (29/59) | 26% (12/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Joris De Loore
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joris De Loore | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (201/228) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.77 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 163 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.65 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (886/1331) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (645/886) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (224/445) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (22/71) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (415/1319) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (6/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Joris De Loore Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Joris De Loore
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Joris De Loore
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
2
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Joris De Loore
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Joris De Loore
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
40
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Joris De Loore
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
7
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
58 of
74)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Radu Albot
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
15
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Titouan Droguet
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Zizou Bergs
79%
(
88 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
127)
19
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
127)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Joris De Loore
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
11
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
John Lamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Loore Vs Lamble Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
