Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordan Thompson vs Kamil Majchrzak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thompson vs Majchrzak analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordan Thompson vs Kamil Majchrzak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thompson has won 55.09% of points on his second serve, while Majchrzak has won 59.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thompson, in recent form, has won 47.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Majchrzak has won 55.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.53% and 38.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thompson has saved 70.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Majchrzak has saved 69.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thompson has won 56.72% of matches played (W/L 38/ 29), with Majchrzak winning 82.5% (W/L 33/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 86/ 62). Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 216/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Thompson has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.12% of matches (W/L 28/ 15), where as Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thompson winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Thompson winning 2 and Majchrzak winning 0. The last match between Thompson and Majchrzak was at the Ilkley Challenger, 19-06-2018, First, Grass with Jordan Thompson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thompson and Majchrzak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thompson winning 0 times and Majchrzak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Thompson winning 1, and Majchrzak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 158.72 while Majchrzak has played against players with an average rank of 198.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thompson has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Majchrzak has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thompson has converted 34.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Majchrzak has converted 47.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Thompson 1 - 0 Majchrzak
35
Rank
32
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
357
Rank
75
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (444-295)
Career Total W/L
64% (366-209)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
83% (33-7)
$2,922,220
Career Prize Money
$867,345
1
YTD Titles
4
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Kamil Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:55 | 1:33:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (50/62) | 62% (46/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (38/50) | 67% (31/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (6/12) | 36% (10/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (33/74) | 29% (18/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jordan Thompson
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Kamil Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 83% (33/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (38/30) | 79% (68/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (345/332) | 65% (483/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 80% (16/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 88% (15/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 158 | 151 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:13 | 1:20:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 150.7 | 198.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1292/2140) | 62% (1283/2065) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (924/1292) | 76% (973/1283) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (466/848) | 60% (468/782) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (67/192) | 47% (132/279) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (812/2206) | 45% (1001/2227) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (21/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 85% (33/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 77% (10/13) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 97% (33/32) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 0% (33/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 14% (7/1) |
Jordan Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
82%
(
86 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
63%
(
84 of
133)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
108)
121
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Yibing Wu
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jordan Thompson
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Jordan Thompson
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Casper Ruud
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
5
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Robin Bertrand
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Michal Krajci
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Thompson Vs Majchrzak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jordan Thompson
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
