Jordan Thompson vs August Holmgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 07:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Thompson vs A. Holmgren

AUS
1
Win
Played
1
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Thompson 1 - 1 Holmgren
They have played 5 sets in total, with Jordan Thompson winning 2 and August Holmgren winning 3. The last match between Jordan Thompson and August Holmgren was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jordan Thompson getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Thompson | 1 |
Holmgren | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai(10-01-25)
(Q1) San Diego Open - San Diego(09-25-21)
J. Thompson vs A. Holmgren H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$4,420,825 | Career Prize Money | $297,485 |
59.57% (476-323) | Career Total W/L | 63.55% (204-117) |
1 | Hard | 1 |
17 | Titles | 7 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
46.43% (13-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (2-2) |
J. Thompson vs A. Holmgren Match Preview:
- Jordan Thompson has been slightly more effective with their second serve, securing 51.39% of points, compared to August Holmgren's 49.40%. Could this serve edge favor Thompson in tight moments?
- In return games, Holmgren has a small advantage. He wins 42.15% of opponents' second serve points, while Thompson captures 40.55%.
- Thompson outperforms on first serve returns, with 22.75% win rate against Holmgren's 20.58%, suggesting a stronger first serve return game.
- Under pressure, Thompson shows a marginally better resilience with a 63.40% breakpoint save rate compared to Holmgren's 62.65%.
- Holmgren edges out in overall yearly performance with a win rate of 50.94%, while Thompson is at 46.88%. Does Holmgren's consistency make him a potential favorite?
- Surface preferences reveal Thompson excels on indoor hard courts (65% win record), while Holmgren thrives on grass (65%).
- In terms of player level, Thompson competes primarily on the Masters series, with a slightly better win rate (53.85%) compared to Holmgren's participation in lower-tier Challenger/ITF tournaments.
- Head-to-head history favors Holmgren, as he won their only encounter, highlighting his capability to challenge Thompson directly.
- The quality of opponents varies significantly, with Thompson facing higher-ranked players (average rank of 56.59) compared to Holmgren's lower-ranked opponents (225.45).
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Thompson has a minor edge, winning 55% of them, whereas Holmgren wins 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match showcases contrasting strengths. Thompson exhibits superior second serve performance and consistency under pressure, which might provide an edge in critical moments.
Holmgren, however, shows better overall yearly form and boasts a previous victory over Thompson, adding confidence to his play style.
Considering the event level and opponent rankings Thompson usually faces, his experience against higher-caliber players should not be underestimated.
While nobody can be certain, the statistics suggest Jordan Thompson might be slightly more poised to secure a win in this anticipated encounter.
Jordan Thompson vs August Holmgren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Thompson vs A. Holmgren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 3 |
26 | Games Won | 26 |
23 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
2:2:10 | Average Match Time | 2:2:10 |
62% (101/162) | 1st Serve % | 62% (103/166) |
74% (75/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (79/103) |
56% (34/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (32/63) |
30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
33% (55/166) | Return Points Win % | 33% (53/162) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Thompson Recent Matches Played
A. Holmgren Recent Matches Played

J. Thompson vs A. Holmgren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.57% (476/323) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.55% (204/117) |
56.54% (1103/848) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.19% (449/297) |
52.55% (9835/8882) | Games Win/Loss | 53.47% (3930/3420) |
60.13% (270/179) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.71% (130/62) |
56.77% (88/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (54/36) |
63.51% (47/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
58.68% (71/50) | Grass Win/Loss | 71.43% (5/2) |
0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
3957 | Aces Total | 1513 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
1292 | Total Double Faults | 843 |
1:31:38 | Average Match Time | 1:31:29 |
465.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.46 |
62% (31144/50104) | 1st Serve % | 63% (11743/18625) |
72% (22309/31144) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (8507/11743) |
52% (9795/18959) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (3696/6882) |
40% (1854/4630) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (639/1723) |
38% (19306/50923) | Return Points Win % | 37% (7246/19507) |
39.44% (28/43) | Slam W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
50.00% (32/32) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
50.00% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
48.82% (103/108) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
68.13% (218/102) | Challenger W/L | 57.48% (73/54) |
73.77% (90/32) | Futures W/L | 69.64% (117/51) |
61% (437/713) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (198/313) |
42% (30/72) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
55% (163/299) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (73/139) |
57% (146/256) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (58/98) |
86% (455/390) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (196/168) |
14% (455/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (196/28) |
25% (344/85) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (125/35) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Thompson (Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
