Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Stenberg vs Adam Heinonen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stenberg vs Heinonen analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Stenberg vs Adam Heinonen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stenberg has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Heinonen has won 44.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stenberg, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heinonen has won 50.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stenberg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heinonen has saved 58.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stenberg has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Heinonen winning 68.18% (W/L 45/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stenberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 26/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 37/ 45). Heinonen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 25/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Stenberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Heinonen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 45/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stenberg winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Stenberg winning 2 and Heinonen winning 1. The last match between Stenberg and Heinonen was at the Sweden F2 (Kalmar), 14-05-2018, First, Clay with Jonathan Stenberg getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stenberg and Heinonen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stenberg winning 1 times and Heinonen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stenberg winning 0, and Heinonen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stenberg has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Heinonen has played against players with an average rank of 41.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stenberg has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heinonen has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stenberg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heinonen has converted 42.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stenberg 1 - 0 Heinonen
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
49% (64-67)
Career Total W/L
62% (69-43)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
76% (19-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jonathan Stenberg | Adam Heinonen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (38/73) | 70% (57/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 63% (36/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (21/35) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (37/82) | 36% (26/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Adam Heinonen
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Stenberg | Adam Heinonen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (19/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (39/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (308/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 80% (16/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (590/926) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (379/590) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (144/336) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (47/118) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (406/932) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (19/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (18/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/3) |
Jonathan Stenberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Axel Bergdahl
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olle Sonesson Lidholt
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
129)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Thibaut Gadilhe
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Adam Heinonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Speziali
Player
Adam Heinonen
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Adam Heinonen
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
112)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
32%
(
15 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Adam Heinonen
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(4) 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Matthew William Donald
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
view more
Stenberg Vs Heinonen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
