Jonathan Stenberg vs Adam Heinonen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L L L L
Form
L W W W L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Stenberg 1 - 0 Heinonen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Stenberg winning 2 and Heinonen winning 1. The last match between Stenberg and Heinonen was at the Sweden F2 (Kalmar), 14-05-2018, First, Clay with Jonathan Stenberg getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jonathan Stenberg | 1 |
| Adam Heinonen | 0 |
Sweden F2 (Kalmar)(14-05-2018)
3
6
6
1
6
3
| Stenberg | Stats | Heinonen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (7-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 782 |
| Highest Rank | 735 | |
| 35 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 48% (64-70) | Career Total W/L | 61% (94-61) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Adam Heinonen
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:55:0 | Average Match Time | 1:55:0 |
| 52% (38/73) | 1st Serve % | 70% (57/82) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (36/57) |
| 60% (21/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 45% (37/82) | Return Points Win % | 36% (26/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jonathan Stenberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jera Staley
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Perez Martin
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Axel Bergdahl
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olle Sonesson Lidholt
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
129)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Heinonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Haupt
Player
Adam Heinonen
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Adam Heinonen
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Szymon Kielan
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Adam Heinonen
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Adam Heinonen
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
13
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Stefan Seifert
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Mika Petkovic
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Adam Heinonen
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (64/70) | Win/Loss | 61% (94/61) |
| 49% (151/156) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (210/147) |
| 50% (1441/1467) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1850/1590) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (34/14) |
| 44% (37/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (46/36) |
| 54% (27/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (14/11) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 155 | Aces Total | 282 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 144 | Total Double Faults | 373 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:5:17 |
| 258.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.77 |
| 60% (1932/3240) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4473/6923) |
| 65% (1251/1932) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2900/4473) |
| 44% (570/1308) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1113/2450) |
| 43% (133/307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (342/765) |
| 40% (1227/3032) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2920/6874) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 48% (64/70) | Futures W/L | 61% (94/59) |
| 48% (63/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (91/152) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 62% (21/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (14/28) |
| 43% (18/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 84% (67/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (89/81) |
| 16% (67/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (89/8) |
| 12% (66/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (66/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
