Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Kanar vs Anton Chekhov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kanar vs Chekhov analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Kanar vs Anton Chekhov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kanar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chekhov has won 57.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kanar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chekhov has won 54.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 43.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kanar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chekhov has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kanar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chekhov winning 62.5% (W/L 5/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kanar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 78/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 16/ 24). Chekhov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 28/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kanar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kanar winning 2 and Chekhov winning 0. The last match between Kanar and Chekhov was at the France F17 (Mulhouse), 12-09-2018, First, I.hard with Jonathan Kanar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kanar and Chekhov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kanar winning 0 times and Chekhov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kanar winning 1, and Chekhov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kanar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chekhov has played against players with an average rank of 95.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kanar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chekhov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kanar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chekhov has converted 58.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kanar 1 - 0 Chekhov
Ret.
Rank
491
High
29
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
54% (155-133)
Career Total W/L
42% (78-107)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jonathan Kanar | Anton Chekhov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (43/80) | 58% (46/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (33/43) | 54% (25/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (14/37) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (39/79) | 41% (33/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Anton Chekhov
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Kanar | Anton Chekhov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (33/23) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.07 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (63/101) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (45/63) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (22/38) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (61/129) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jonathan Kanar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jonathan Kanar
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Nick Hardt
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Jonathan Kanar
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
90)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jonathan Kanar
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Jonathan Kanar
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Jonathan Kanar
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Jonathan Kanar
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Vito Dell'Elba
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Jonathan Kanar
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Anton Chekhov
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anton Chekhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Anton Chekhov
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anton Chekhov
Player
Temudzhin Iskandirov
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Agafonov
Player
Anton Chekhov
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Chekhov
Player
Dmitry Dolzhenkov
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anton Chekhov
Player
Marsel Ilhan
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
52
Total Points Won
61
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Anton Chekhov
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kanar Vs Chekhov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
