Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Eysseric vs Daniil Medvedev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eysseric vs Medvedev analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Eysseric vs Daniil Medvedev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eysseric has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Medvedev has won 49.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eysseric, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medvedev has won 53.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eysseric has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medvedev has saved 63.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eysseric has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Medvedev winning 74.32% (W/L 55/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eysseric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 338/ 217), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 81/ 45).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Eysseric winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Eysseric winning 2 and Medvedev winning 6. The last match between Eysseric and Medvedev was at the ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam, 10-02-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Daniil Medvedev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:25:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eysseric and Medvedev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eysseric winning 0 times and Medvedev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Eysseric winning 2, and Medvedev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eysseric has played against opponents with an average rank of while Medvedev has played against players with an average rank of 90.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eysseric has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medvedev has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eysseric has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medvedev has converted 42.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Eysseric 1 - 3 Medvedev
898
Rank
202
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor3
0
Grass0
4
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
55% (477-385)
Career Total W/L
72% (511-203)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
79% (22-6)
$71,205
Career Prize Money
$29,161,850
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jonathan Eysseric | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 6 |
| Games Won | 29 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:25:29 | 0:25:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (42/86) | 61% (53/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (23/42) | 87% (46/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 34% (15/44) | 53% (18/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 75% (9/12) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (23/87) | 56% (48/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | |||||
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Eysseric | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (22/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (52/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (411/345) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 82% (18/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 160 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 116 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:7:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 100.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1475/2389) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (1071/1475) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (460/914) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (105/241) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (974/2436) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (16/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/7) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 83% (10/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 89% (8/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 58% (12/7) |
Jonathan Eysseric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
10
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Dan Added
53%
(
59 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexander Bublik
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Sebastian Korda
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
37 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Gael Monfils
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Daniil Medvedev
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Dominik Koepfer
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Eysseric Vs Medvedev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
