Prediction of Jonathan Canter vs Brett Custer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Canter vs B. Custer

Jonathan Canter

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

357

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Brett Custer

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

357

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Canter 1 - 0 Custer

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonathan Canter winning 2 and Brett Custer winning 0. The last match between Jonathan Canter and Brett Custer was at the Sydney CH, 17-10-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Canter getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Canter	1
Custer	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Sydney CH(10-17-83)

Stats

Jonathan Canter

Brett Custer

J. Canter vs B. Custer H2H Profile

J. Canter	Stats	B. Custer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.12% (97-118)	Career Total W/L	31.82% (7-15)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Canter vs B. Custer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonathan Canter has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brett Custer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonathan Canter, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brett Custer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jonathan Canter has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brett Custer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jonathan Canter has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Brett Custer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jonathan Canter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 5/18). Brett Custer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 6/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Jonathan Canter has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Brett Custer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jonathan Canter winning 1 times and Brett Custer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonathan Canter winning 2 and Brett Custer winning 0.
The last match between Jonathan Canter and Brett Custer was at the Sydney CH, 17-10-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Canter getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonathan Canter has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Brett Custer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonathan Canter has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brett Custer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonathan Canter has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brett Custer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jonathan Canter vs Brett Custer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Canter vs B. Custer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Canter	Stats	B. Custer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Canter Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 15-08-1994
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Wimbledon - 20-06-1994
R1 Richey RenebergR. Reneberg	L	7-6(5) 6-3 7-6(5)	Stats
Key Biscayne - 07-03-1994
R1 Mark KnowlesM. Knowles	L	7-5 7-5	Stats
Sydney - 04-10-1993
QF Wayne FerreiraW. Ferreira	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Henrik HolmH. Holm	W	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Custer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tasmania CH - 22-11-1989
R3 Jason CaskJ. Cask	L	7-6 7-6	Stats
Brisbane CH - 25-09-1989
R3 Lars KoslowskiL. Koslowski	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
New Haven CH - 07-08-1989
R3 Alberto ParisA. Paris	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R4 Brian GarrowB. Garrow	L	6-2 2-6 6-4	Stats
Seattle CH - 31-07-1989
R3 Olli RahnastoO. Rahnasto	L	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Canter vs B. Custer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Canter	Stats	B. Custer
45.12% (97/118)	YTD Win/Loss	31.82% (7/15)
45.96% (250/294)	Sets Win/Loss	35.19% (19/35)
49.27% (2582/2659)	Games Win/Loss	45.81% (235/278)
51.56% (66/62)	Hard Win/Loss	37.50% (6/10)
21.74% (5/18)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
38.24% (13/21)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (1/3)
43.33% (13/17)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
348.09	Average Opponent Rank	504.45
27.27% (6/16)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/2)
54.29% (19/16)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
39.81% (43/65)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (1/3)
58.00% (29/21)	Challenger W/L	37.50% (6/10)
46% (85/184)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	35% (7/20)
34% (10/29)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
44% (32/73)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (3/8)
76% (101/77)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (6/5)
24% (101/24)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (6/1)
17% (113/19)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (16/2)