Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John-Patrick Smith vs William Bushamuka Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Bushamuka analysis and find out who is favored!
John-Patrick Smith vs William Bushamuka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bushamuka has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bushamuka has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bushamuka has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Bushamuka winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 174/ 143), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 18/ 19). Bushamuka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 57/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Bushamuka has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smith winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Bushamuka winning 1. The last match between Smith and Bushamuka was at the Lexington Challenger, 31-07-2017, First, Hard with John-Patrick Smith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Bushamuka have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smith winning 1 times and Bushamuka 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 0, and Bushamuka 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.5 while Bushamuka has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bushamuka has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bushamuka has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Bushamuka
864
Rank
108
High
35
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
54% (294-251)
Career Total W/L
48% (73-80)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$377,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John-Patrick Smith | William Bushamuka |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:22 | 2:9:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (68/101) | 62% (51/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (48/68) | 67% (34/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (19/33) | 58% (18/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (30/82) | 34% (34/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
John-Patrick Smith
Player
William Bushamuka
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John-Patrick Smith | William Bushamuka |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John-Patrick Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
John-Patrick Smith
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
John-Patrick Smith
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Oscar Manuel Sanchez Hirales
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
William Bushamuka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
William Bushamuka
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
William Bushamuka
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Hadigian
Player
William Bushamuka
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
William Bushamuka
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(9) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
William Bushamuka
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
13 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Smith Vs Bushamuka Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
