Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John Hallquist Lithen vs Sebastian Gima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lithen vs Gima analysis and find out who is favored!
John Hallquist Lithen vs Sebastian Gima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lithen 1 - 0 Gima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lithen has won 47.06% of points on their second serve, while Gima has won 49.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lithen, in recent form, has won 56.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gima has won 57.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.69% and 34.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lithen has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gima has saved 58.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lithen has won 76.92% of matches played (W/L 20/ 6), with Gima winning 56.1% (W/L 46/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lithen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 21/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Lithen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 20/ 6), where as Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.7% of matches (W/L 40/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lithen winning 1 times and Gima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lithen winning 2 and Gima winning 0. The last match between Lithen and Gima was at the M25 Ystad, 16-08-2023, First, Clay with John Hallquist Lithen getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lithen and Gima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lithen winning 0 times and Gima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lithen winning 1, and Gima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lithen has played against opponents with an average rank of 50.46 while Gima has played against players with an average rank of 156.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lithen has won 86% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gima has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lithen has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gima has converted 43.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
540
Rank
436
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
67% (26-13)
Career Total W/L
58% (175-126)
86% (12-2)
YTD W/L
54% (21-18)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For John Hallquist Lithen vs Sebastian Gima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lithen VS Gima
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | John Hallquist Lithen | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:0 | 2:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (64/87) | 50% (42/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (39/64) | 57% (24/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (10/23) | 43% (18/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 31% (5/16) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (42/84) | 44% (38/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats 
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Hallquist Lithen | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 86% (12/2) | 54% (21/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (24/10) | 54% (49/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (192/123) | 52% (430/402) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 86% (12/2) | 57% (21/16) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:25 | 1:48:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 32 | 153 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (405/643) | 61% (1648/2718) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (263/405) | 64% (1056/1648) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (112/238) | 49% (525/1070) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (45/99) | 44% (141/323) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (318/657) | 43% (1215/2799) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 58% (18/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (12/14) | 53% (20/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (6/6) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 86% (22/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 14% (22/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 12% (17/2) |
John Hallquist Lithen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Luca Staeheli
72%
(
80 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
79 of
125)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
123
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(0) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Daniele Rapagnetta
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Alan Bojarski
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
43%
(
34 of
80)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Szymon Kielan
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
49 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 5-7 10-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Matej Dodig
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jonas Forejtek
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Vojtech Vales
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Sebastian Gima
51%
(
62 of
122)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
43%
(
26 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dax Donders
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lithen Vs Gima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lithen are available here and Gima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For John Hallquist Lithen
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sebastian Gima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
