Johannes Ingildsen vs Andrea Pellegrino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Andrea Pellegrino displays slightly stronger second serve performance, winning 42.86% of points, whereas Johannes Ingildsen secures 38.24%. How might this influence the match outcome? Typically, better second serve stats can lead to a competitive edge.
• In terms of return game proficiency, Johannes Ingildsen excels, securing 53.57% of opponents' second serve points compared to Andrea Pellegrino's 43.14%. However, Pellegrino struggles more on first serve returns, with rates of 28.88% versus Ingildsen's 34.06%.
• When facing breakpoints, Johannes Ingildsen saves them slightly more often at 50.00%, compared to Pellegrino's 48.65%. Could Ingildsen's composure under pressure give him an advantage? Potentially, yes.
• Both players have comparable overall match win rates over the past year, with Andrea Pellegrino at 61.54% and Johannes Ingildsen closely trailing at 60.00%, making this matchup particularly competitive.
• Andrea Pellegrino's preferred surface seems to be clay, with a 56% win rate, while Johannes Ingildsen achieves his best results on indoor hard courts at 58%. Neither excels on grass, especially Ingildsen who hasn't won a match on this surface.
• Considering the tournament level, Andrea Pellegrino has more match experience at the ITF/Challenger level, holding a 63.16% win rate, slightly better than Johannes Ingildsen's 60.00% in a limited number of matches.
• Andrea Pellegrino has faced stronger opponents on average, with an average ranking of 244.28 versus Johannes Ingildsen's average opponent ranked at 321.4. Does this higher level of competition play make Pellegrino more battle-ready? It seems so.
• In deciding set scenarios, Johannes Ingildsen boasts a perfect winning rate in the past year, although Andrea Pellegrino also performs well, winning 74% of these matches.

Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the recent performance metrics and historical data for Andrea Pellegrino and Johannes Ingildsen, several factors appear pivotal in forecasting the likely victor of their upcoming contest.

Andrea Pellegrino demonstrates a marginal advantage with his second serve capability and extensive experience against higher-ranked adversaries. Meanwhile, Johannes Ingildsen shows a strong return game, particularly on second serves, and maintains composure when breakpoints arise.

The deciding set historical data makes Ingildsen an intriguing prospect, but Pellegrino’s comprehensive match experience and consistency on clay may just tip the balance in his favor.

Overall, considering the assorted aspects and recent form, Andrea Pellegrino is slightly more favored to secure victory in this upcoming match.