Johan Nikles vs Petr Nesterov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Johan Nikles has won 42.45% of points on his second serve in the last six months, while Petr Nesterov boasts a higher rate at 48.10%. Does this suggest an advantage for Petr? It might, as second serve performance is key in match predictions.
• Return Game Stats: Nikles has been more effective on returns, winning 48.66% of opponent's second serve points compared to Nesterov's 46.48%. Additionally, in first serve returns, Johan edges out Petr, 33.88% against 32.04%.
• Under Pressure: Breakpoint savings can be pivotal—Nikles saves 50.00% and Nesterov 54.55%. Who holds up better in tough situations? Currently, Nesterov seems marginally stronger.
• Performance Overview: Johan has won 60.66% of his matches the past year, closely aligned with Petr's 59.38%. Should this sway our expectations significantly? Perhaps not, as their win rates are similar.
• Best Surface: Johan excels on Hard surfaces with a 62% win rate, faring the worst on I.hard. Conversely, Petr thrives on I.hard with 62% wins but struggles on clay.
• Player Level: Most of Johan's matches occur in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments where he wins 63.79%, slightly below Petr's 66.67% in the same category.
• Direct H2H Matches: In their sole encounter, Petr Nesterov defeated Johan Nikles, highlighting a previous edge in their matchup.
• Head to Head Match Duration: These players finish fast, averaging match times under 46 minutes, suggesting decisive play styles.
• Opponent Quality: Johan typically faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 347.93 compared to Petr's average opponent rank of 422.89.
• Deciding Set Performance: Petr has been more successful in deciding sets, winning 67% over Johan's 38%, making Petr the likely favorite if the match extends to three sets.

Editorial Prediction (October 11, 2025, UTC):

Petr Nesterov's superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving under pressure lend him an advantage going into this match. Despite Johan Nikles leading slightly in return game stats, past performance in direct head-to-head encounters favors Nesterov.

While Nikles competes against higher-ranked opponents, the context shifts when focusing on their surface preferences, where Nesterov's strengths on I.hard play into his favored conditions. The deciding set success rate also tilts support towards Nesterov.

In conclusion, based on these outlined factors, Petr Nesterov is the probable winner in the upcoming tennis match.