Johan Nikles vs Jeffrey Fradkin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Johan Nikles has a slight advantage in second serve point wins, achieving 42.46% compared to Jeffrey Fradkin's 37.82% in the past six months.
• How does each player perform when returning serves? Johan Nikles is stronger, winning 49.24% of points on opponent's second serve and 33.90% on the first, whereas Fradkin's stats are lower at 41.61% and 28.64%, respectively.
• Under pressure, Fradkin excels at saving breakpoints, prevailing in 54.29% of situations, narrowly surpassing Nikles' 50.80% success rate.
• In terms of match outcomes, Fradkin edges out Nikles with a slightly better win percentage of 61.54% over the last year, but Nikles has played significantly more matches.
• Both players share their highest winning percentage on Hard surfaces, each achieving 61%, but Nikles struggles on I.hard (23% win rate) and Fradkin on Clay (50% win rate).
• Both have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, where Nikles has a narrow win rate edge of 62.50% to Fradkin's 61.54%, over a notably larger number of matches.
• Fradkin has faced much tougher opponents with an average rank of 111.65, while Nikles’s opponents ranked 350.83 on average.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Fradkin holds an advantage, winning 43% of such sets, compared to Nikles' 38% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (October 9, 2025, UTC):

Upcoming tennis matches often hinge on subtle statistical edges, and a close examination of Johan Nikles and Jeffrey Fradkin’s recent performances reveals intriguing insights.

Nikles shows a slight edge with second serve performance and returns, crucial aspects that often decide the ebb and flow of tennis matches. These statistics suggest that in a prolonged baseline battle, Nikles might pierce through more frequently.

However, Fradkin is adept at saving breakpoints and has faced stiffer competition, suggesting resilience against adversaries of higher caliber. His stronger performance in deciding sets lends him an advantage should the match enter a pressure-laden finale.

Considering both players perform best on Hard surfaces and are comparably matched in tournament levels, it is the quality of opposition Fradkin has encountered that tilts the scale towards him slightly.

Despite the narrow statistical differences, the combination of Fradkin's breakpoint saving ability and experience against higher-ranked opponents indicates he is slightly favored to win this match.