Joao Fonseca vs Hugo Gaston Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Mar at 03:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Fonseca vs H. Gaston

BRA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fonseca 0 - 0 Gaston
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fonseca | 0 |
| Gaston | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
J. Fonseca vs H. Gaston H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Titles | 9 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Fonseca vs H. Gaston Match Preview:
How critical is the second serve performance for predicting the outcome of this tennis match between Gaston and Fonseca? Examining their track records over the last six months reveals that Fonseca has the upper hand, clinching 48.82% of points on his second serve compared to Gaston's 43.14%. Is this a decisive factor? Considering the strong correlation between second serve performance and match outcomes, it may very well be.
But what about their efforts when returning serve? Gaston edges out Fonseca slightly by winning 44.13% of points on his opponent's second serve to Fonseca's 42.66%. Interestingly, Fonseca has a slight advantage in returning first serves, claiming 26.66% compared to Gaston's 25.36%. This subtle tug-of-war surely adds an intriguing layer to any head-to-head predictions.
Now let’s delve into how these players handle themselves under pressure. Fonseca shines in this department, saving 58.3% of breakpoints he's faced, trumping Gaston’s 50.76%. Savvy in-game bettors gravitate towards these stats—it’s all about who keeps their nerve when the chips are down.
When contrasting the overall performance over the last year, Fonseca comes out on top again with 67.69% of his matches won (44 victories to 21 losses) versus Gaston's 48.28% (28 wins to 30 losses). This paints a picture of consistent excellence for Fonseca, while Gaston finds himself battling the odds.
Surface preference adds another dimension to this battle. Gaston’s strongest footing is on clay, with a 62% career win rate. Conversely, Fonseca excels on hard courts, winning 75% of his matches. Neither particularly embraces the grass, with Gaston at 44% and Fonseca at a mere 33% win rate. Can the surface influence the duel's outcome despite neither player's favorability on grass?
Player level also plays a role; Gaston predominantly competes on the Main tour with a 48.15% success rate, while Fonseca dominates the Challenger/ITF $10K circuit with an impressive 72.97% win rate. However, Gaston faces higher-caliber competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 124.72 compared to Fonseca’s 143.18. Could this provide Gaston with an edge in high-pressure scenarios?
Should the match reach a deciding set, Fonseca may again hold the advantage, having triumphed in 56% of such sets versus Gaston's 50%. But what about their proficiency in capitalizing on breakpoints? Gaston excels slightly, converting 34.55% of his opportunities, outpacing Fonseca’s 31.06%—a crucial stat for those betting live.
In summation, who is most likely to emerge victorious in this clash? The stats favor Fonseca, with his superior win rates and under-pressure resilience likely tipping the scale against Gaston. Yet, with tennis’s unpredictable nature, fans and bettors alike will be keenly observing to see if Gaston can leverage his return prowess and marginal breakpoint conversion edge to price himself back into contention.
Joao Fonseca vs Hugo Gaston Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
J. Fonseca Recent Matches Played
H. Gaston Recent Matches Played

J. Fonseca vs H. Gaston Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.77% (88/50) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.26% (268/217) |
| 60.76% (209/135) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.76% (622/557) |
| 53.04% (1747/1547) | Games Win/Loss | 50.90% (5550/5354) |
| 73.81% (31/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.00% (48/52) |
| 59.68% (37/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.57% (137/93) |
| 68.18% (15/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.07% (76/62) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 41.18% (7/10) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 720 | Aces Total | 1249 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 294 | Total Double Faults | 1127 |
| 1:43:44 | Average Match Time | 1:35:15 |
| 202.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.09 |
| 64% (6462/10030) | 1st Serve % | 56% (18702/33413) |
| 71% (4557/6462) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12513/18702) |
| 53% (1904/3568) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7410/14711) |
| 39% (402/1031) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1499/3411) |
| 39% (4038/10464) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13583/33312) |
| 64.71% (11/6) | Slam W/L | 47.83% (22/24) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (20/30) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.54% (16/10) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (36/54) |
| 65.52% (38/20) | Challenger W/L | 61.05% (116/74) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 67.89% (74/35) |
| 62% (76/122) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (250/445) |
| 73% (11/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (12/33) |
| 57% (37/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (91/155) |
| 55% (26/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (95/167) |
| 89% (81/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (258/213) |
| 11% (81/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (258/45) |
| 26% (57/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (227/52) |