Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Radu David Turcanu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jun at 08:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Eduardo Schiessl vs R. David Turcanu

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schiessl 1 - 0 Turcanu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl winning 2 and Radu David Turcanu winning 0. The last match between Joao Eduardo Schiessl and Radu David Turcanu was at the M15 Cluj Napoca, 19-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schiessl | 1 |
| Turcanu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Cluj Napoca(06-19-25)
J. E. Schiessl vs R. D. Turcanu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.48% (131-93) | Career Total W/L | 64.89% (61-33) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. E. Schiessl vs R. D. Turcanu Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Turcanu has outperformed Schiessl on second serve points, winning 46.44% compared to Schiessl's 43.08%. Could this be a decisive factor in their upcoming encounter?
- Turcanu also leads in returns against second serves, with a success rate of 47.42% over Schiessl's 42.67%. How significant is this advantage?
- On first serve returns, both players show close proficiency, with Schiessl slightly ahead at 30.65% compared to Turcanu's 30.19%.
- Schiessl has a stronger record in saving breakpoints recently, achieving 55.61% compared to Turcanu's 51.94%.
- When it comes to match victories in the past year, Turcanu holds a solid 70% win rate, outpacing Schiessl's 54.1%.
- The best playing surface for Turcanu is Hard courts with a 73% win rate, while Schiessl favors Clay courts, winning 57% of matches on that surface.
- Turcanu faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 286.33 over the past year, whereas Schiessl's opponents averaged a rank of 378.69.
- In deciding sets, Turcanu is noticeably stronger, winning 70% compared to Schiessl's 39% success rate. Does this indicate an edge in high-pressure situations?
- Regarding break point conversions, Turcanu exceeds with 38.71%, while Schiessl stands at 34.48%, indicating a slightly higher efficiency under key moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
Turcanu's recent performance indicates a slight edge over Schiessl, particularly notable in second serve and return stats. This edge correlates closely with successful outcomes in matches, making it a crucial factor in the upcoming matchup.
Playing on Hard courts, where Turcanu performs best, may amplify their advantage, given Schiessl has a lower win percentage on this surface. In high-stakes scenarios, such as deciding sets, Turcanu shows considerable better composure and results.
Schiessl has shown resilience in saving breakpoints, which could present challenges for Turcanu. However, the overall consistency and ability to convert under pressure tilt the prediction in favor of Turcanu, rendering them the likely winner of this upcoming match.
Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Radu David Turcanu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. E. Schiessl vs R. D. Turcanu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:18 | Average Match Time | 1:21:18 |
| 79% (37/47) | 1st Serve % | 57% (33/58) |
| 81% (30/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 40% (4/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 47% (27/58) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. E. Schiessl Recent Matches Played
R. D. Turcanu Recent Matches Played

J. E. Schiessl vs R. D. Turcanu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.48% (131/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.89% (61/33) |
| 58.14% (300/216) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.83% (132/85) |
| 52.94% (2573/2287) | Games Win/Loss | 54.03% (1093/930) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 59.14% (110/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.38% (51/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 128 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 359 | Total Double Faults | 211 |
| 1:29:36 | Average Match Time | 1:10:16 |
| 378.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 351.96 |
| 66% (8311/12630) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2406/4064) |
| 65% (5434/8311) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1520/2406) |
| 49% (2118/4319) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (813/1658) |
| 46% (599/1308) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (199/480) |
| 41% (5196/12534) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1727/4075) |
| 40.74% (11/16) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 60.91% (120/77) | Futures W/L | 66.30% (61/31) |
| 59% (131/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (60/93) |
| 58% (29/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (12/20) |
| 45% (31/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (19/30) |
| 89% (126/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (65/58) |
| 11% (126/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (65/7) |
| 19% (98/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (29/3) |