Joan Cross Johnson vs Pam Watermeyer Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Cross Johnson vs P. Watermeyer

Joan Cross Johnson

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pam Watermeyer

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Johnson 1 - 0 Watermeyer

They have played 2 sets in total, with Joan Cross Johnson winning 2 and Pam Watermeyer winning 0. The last match between Joan Cross Johnson and Pam Watermeyer was at the Johannesburg, 06-04-1960, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Joan Cross Johnson getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Johnson	1
Watermeyer	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Johannesburg(04-06-60)

Stats

Joan Cross Johnson

Pam Watermeyer

J. C. Johnson vs P. Watermeyer H2H Profile

J. C. Johnson	Stats	P. Watermeyer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
59.02% (36-25)	Career Total W/L	43.02% (37-49)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. C. Johnson vs P. Watermeyer Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Joan Cross Johnson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pam Watermeyer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Joan Cross Johnson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pam Watermeyer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Joan Cross Johnson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pam Watermeyer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Joan Cross Johnson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Pam Watermeyer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Joan Cross Johnson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 6/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Pam Watermeyer has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 14/ 13), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
Player level: In the last year, Joan Cross Johnson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Pam Watermeyer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Joan Cross Johnson winning 1 times and Pam Watermeyer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Joan Cross Johnson winning 2 and Pam Watermeyer winning 0. The last match between Joan Cross Johnson and Pam Watermeyer was at the Johannesburg, 06-04-1960, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Joan Cross Johnson getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Joan Cross Johnson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pam Watermeyer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Joan Cross Johnson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pam Watermeyer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Joan Cross Johnson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pam Watermeyer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Joan Cross Johnson vs Pam Watermeyer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. C. Johnson vs P. Watermeyer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. C. Johnson	Stats	P. Watermeyer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. C. Johnson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg Transvaal Chps - 04-12-1967
SF Bernice CarrB. Carr	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg Transvaal Chps 3 - 03-10-1964
Eunice PassmoreE. Passmore	L	6-4 1-6 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg Transvaal Chps 1 - 16-02-1964
R3 Ann JonesA. Jones	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Johannesburg Transvaal - 16-09-1963
F Marlene GersonM. Gerson	W	7-5 6-1	Stats
Johannesburg Transvaal Chps - 11-09-1961
Charleen RigbyC. Rigby	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Watermeyer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 06-04-1970
Q1 Daphne PattisonD. Pattison	L	3-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 14-04-1969
R3 Patricia WalkdenP. Walkden	L	W/O	Stats
Brumana - 24-08-1965
Mounira ZeydanM. Zeydan	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
SF Francoise DurrF. Durr	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Istanbul - 17-08-1965
SF Annette Van ZylA. Van	L	6-0 5-7 6-2	Stats

View All

J. C. Johnson vs P. Watermeyer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. C. Johnson	Stats	P. Watermeyer
59.02% (36/25)	YTD Win/Loss	43.02% (37/49)
57.58% (76/56)	Sets Win/Loss	44.20% (80/101)
53.59% (634/549)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (770/0)
42.86% (9/12)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (6/12)
70.37% (19/8)	Clay Win/Loss	43.75% (14/18)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
33.33% (2/4)	Grass Win/Loss	51.85% (14/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0	Average Opponent Rank	1.6
33.33% (1/2)	Slam W/L	28.57% (2/5)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/2)
58% (35/60)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (32/79)
50% (6/12)	Deciding Set Win %	29% (6/21)
89% (36/32)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (36/28)
11% (36/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (36/8)
13% (24/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (44/4)