Prediction of Jing Qian Yi vs Mimma Chernovita Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Qian Yi vs M. Chernovita

Jing Qian Yi

CHN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

438

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mimma Chernovita

INA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

438

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Yi 1 - 0 Chernovita

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jing Qian Yi winning 2 and Mimma Chernovita winning 0. The last match between Jing Qian Yi and Mimma Chernovita was at the ITF Bangkok 2, 09-09-1991, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jing Qian Yi getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Yi	1
Chernovita	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Bangkok 2(09-09-91)

Stats

Jing Qian Yi

Mimma Chernovita

J. Q. Yi vs M. Chernovita H2H Profile

J. Q. Yi	Stats	M. Chernovita
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.49% (125-63)	Career Total W/L	37.80% (31-51)
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Q. Yi vs M. Chernovita Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jing Qian Yi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mimma Chernovita has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jing Qian Yi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mimma Chernovita has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jing Qian Yi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mimma Chernovita has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jing Qian Yi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mimma Chernovita winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jing Qian Yi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 27/12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/5). Mimma Chernovita has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 11/16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Jing Qian Yi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mimma Chernovita has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jing Qian Yi winning 1 times and Mimma Chernovita being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jing Qian Yi winning 2 and Mimma Chernovita winning 0.
The last match between Jing Qian Yi and Mimma Chernovita was at the ITF Bangkok 2, 09-09-1991, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jing Qian Yi getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jing Qian Yi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mimma Chernovita has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jing Qian Yi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mimma Chernovita has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jing Qian Yi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mimma Chernovita has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jing Qian Yi vs Mimma Chernovita Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Q. Yi vs M. Chernovita H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Q. Yi	Stats	M. Chernovita
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Q. Yi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Pattaya - 18-11-1996
R3 Florencia LabatF. Labat	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Beijing - 14-10-1996
R4 Shi Ting WangS. Ting	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R3 Yuka YoshidaY. Yoshida	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
US Open - 26-08-1996
R1 Barbara PaulusB. Paulus	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
San Diego - 19-08-1996
Q1 Venus WilliamsV. Williams	L	6-1 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Chernovita Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wismilak International - Surabaya - 22-09-1997
R1 Dally RandriantefyD. Randriantefy	L	7-6(5) 6-3	Stats
Danamon Open - Jakarta - 21-04-1997
R1 Jane ChiJ. Chi	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Surabaya - 07-10-1996
Q1 Agustine LimantoA. Limanto	L	6-2 4-6 6-4	Stats
Jakarta 50K - 05-08-1996
R3 Haruka InoueH. Inoue	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Hatfield 10K - 29-04-1996
R3 Stephanie KovacicS. Kovacic	W	7-6 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Q. Yi vs M. Chernovita Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Q. Yi	Stats	M. Chernovita
66.49% (125/63)	YTD Win/Loss	37.80% (31/51)
63.66% (275/157)	Sets Win/Loss	39.78% (72/109)
56.99% (2166/1635)	Games Win/Loss	45.36% (723/871)
66.94% (81/40)	Hard Win/Loss	37.04% (20/34)
69.23% (27/12)	Clay Win/Loss	40.74% (11/16)
71.43% (10/4)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
44.44% (4/5)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
417.45	Average Opponent Rank	505.84
25.00% (1/3)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
85.71% (6/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/2)
71.03% (103/42)	Challenger W/L	38.98% (23/36)
60.00% (3/2)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
67% (125/186)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	37% (30/81)
48% (12/25)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	29% (2/7)
59% (34/58)	Deciding Set Win %	37% (7/19)
88% (121/107)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (34/26)
11% (121/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (34/8)
27% (66/18)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (47/4)