Prediction of Jia Qi Kang vs Ching-Wen Hsu Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Qi Kang vs C. Hsu

Jia Qi Kang
CHN
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
0
Win
2
Played
2
Win
28
Age
29
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
341
Best Rank
317
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.2K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ching-Wen Hsu
TPE
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
0
Win
2
Played
2
Win
28
Age
29
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
341
Best Rank
317
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.2K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kang 0 - 2 Hsu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jia Qi Kang winning 0 and Ching-Wen Hsu winning 4. The last match between Ching-Wen Hsu and Jia Qi Kang was at the Wuhan, 25-07-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Ching-Wen Hsu getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kang | 0 |
| Hsu | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Wuhan(07-25-16)
Ching-Wen Hsu
6
6
Jia Qi Kang
3
2
(R2) Qujing(07-13-16)
Ching-Wen Hsu
6
6
Jia Qi Kang
3
3
J. Q. Kang vs C. Hsu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,198 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.56% (158-137) | Career Total W/L | 53.23% (173-152) |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Q. Kang vs C. Hsu Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jia Qi Kang has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ching-Wen Hsu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jia Qi Kang, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ching-Wen Hsu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jia Qi Kang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ching-Wen Hsu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jia Qi Kang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ching-Wen Hsu winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jia Qi Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 21/11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 129/120). Ching-Wen Hsu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 11/8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Jia Qi Kang has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ching-Wen Hsu has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jia Qi Kang winning 0 times and Ching-Wen Hsu being victorious 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jia Qi Kang winning 0 and Ching-Wen Hsu winning 4.
- The last match between Jia Qi Kang and Ching-Wen Hsu was at the Wuhan, 25-07-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Ching-Wen Hsu getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jia Qi Kang has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ching-Wen Hsu has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jia Qi Kang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ching-Wen Hsu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jia Qi Kang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ching-Wen Hsu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jia Qi Kang vs Ching-Wen Hsu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Q. Kang vs C. Hsu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 11 | Games Won | 24 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kang 0%, Hsu 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kang 0%, Hsu 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kang 0%, Hsu 0%.
J. Q. Kang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-2 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
C. Hsu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

J. Q. Kang vs C. Hsu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.56% (158/137) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.23% (173/152) |
| 53.23% (363/319) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.37% (386/351) |
| 52.27% (3213/2934) | Games Win/Loss | 50.71% (3333/3240) |
| 51.81% (129/120) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (150/125) |
| 65.63% (21/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.89% (11/8) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.00% (9/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 485 | Aces Total | 327 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 547 | Total Double Faults | 421 |
| 1:2:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 589.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 638.47 |
| 61% (7726/12604) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5581/9116) |
| 62% (4804/7726) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3435/5581) |
| 45% (2208/4878) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1606/3535) |
| 46% (699/1528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (463/1034) |
| 45% (5490/12333) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3915/9068) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 23.08% (3/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 48.68% (92/97) | Challenger W/L | 46.71% (78/89) |
| 67.74% (63/30) | Futures W/L | 62.00% (93/57) |
| 53% (153/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (169/317) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 36% (23/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (34/57) |
| 48% (47/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (46/86) |
| 79% (167/132) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (174/148) |
| 20% (167/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (174/26) |
| 20% (128/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (151/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 10-5
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal