Jessie Aney vs Quinn Gleason Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Aney vs Q. Gleason

Jessie Aney
USA
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
31
-
Height
-
859
C. Rank
894
343
Best Rank
323
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.4K
Career Money
$4.3K
-
Plays
-

Quinn Gleason
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
31
-
Height
-
859
C. Rank
894
343
Best Rank
323
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.4K
Career Money
$4.3K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Aney 1 - 0 Gleason
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jessie Aney winning 2 and Quinn Gleason winning 1. The last match between Jessie Aney and Quinn Gleason was at the W25 Fredericton, 07-03-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jessie Aney getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aney | 1 |
| Gleason | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W25 Fredericton(03-07-23)
Jessie Aney
4
6
6
Quinn Gleason
6
3
2
J. Aney vs Q. Gleason H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,360 | Career Prize Money | $4,345 |
| 59.54% (231-157) | Career Total W/L | 54.84% (153-126) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Aney vs Q. Gleason Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jessie Aney has won 40.63% of points on their second serve, while Quinn Gleason has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jessie Aney, in recent form, has won 48.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quinn Gleason has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jessie Aney has saved 57.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quinn Gleason has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jessie Aney has won 38.46% of matches played (W/L 5/8), with Quinn Gleason winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jessie Aney has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 17/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 60/55). Quinn Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 82/58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jessie Aney has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 5/8), where as Quinn Gleason has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jessie Aney winning 1 times and Quinn Gleason being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jessie Aney winning 2 and Quinn Gleason winning 1.
- The last match between Jessie Aney and Quinn Gleason was at the W25 Fredericton, 07-03-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jessie Aney getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jessie Aney has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.15 while Quinn Gleason has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jessie Aney has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quinn Gleason has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jessie Aney has converted 36.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quinn Gleason has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jessie Aney vs Quinn Gleason Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Aney vs Q. Gleason H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:26:0 | Average Match Time | 2:26:0 |
| 52% (47/91) | 1st Serve % | 73% (62/85) |
| 74% (35/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (34/62) |
| 50% (22/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 46% (39/85) | Return Points Win % | 37% (34/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Aney 43%, Gleason 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Aney 55%, Gleason 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Aney 50%, Gleason 0%.
J. Aney Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(0) 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
Q. Gleason Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

J. Aney vs Q. Gleason Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.54% (231/157) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.84% (153/126) |
| 57.30% (514/383) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.40% (346/302) |
| 53.45% (4448/3874) | Games Win/Loss | 51.63% (3051/2858) |
| 52.17% (60/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.88% (55/49) |
| 62.66% (151/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.57% (82/58) |
| 62.50% (20/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 707 | Aces Total | 181 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1064 | Total Double Faults | 420 |
| 1:17:34 | Average Match Time | 1:17:20 |
| 472.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.05 |
| 57% (11375/20035) | 1st Serve % | 73% (10205/13914) |
| 62% (7054/11375) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (5863/10205) |
| 45% (3880/8660) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1697/3707) |
| 49% (1294/2628) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (778/1639) |
| 47% (9666/20522) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6187/13928) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 51.52% (119/112) | Challenger W/L | 50.26% (98/97) |
| 74.50% (111/38) | Futures W/L | 71.62% (53/21) |
| 59% (230/387) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (146/271) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 56% (43/77) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (29/59) |
| 57% (69/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (49/94) |
| 87% (222/194) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (156/124) |
| 13% (222/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (156/32) |
| 22% (166/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (123/28) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:10 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction08:15 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:35 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal