Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeremy Jahn vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jahn vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Jahn vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jahn has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pichler has won 50.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jahn, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 53.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jahn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 56.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jahn has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 14), with Pichler winning 45.9% (W/L 28/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jahn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 229/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Jahn has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 17/ 11), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jahn winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jahn winning 0 and Pichler winning 2. The last match between Jahn and Pichler was at the M15 Kamen, 25-06-2022, Semifinals, Clay with David Pichler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jahn and Pichler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jahn winning 0 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jahn winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jahn has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.64 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 205.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jahn has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jahn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 45.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jahn 0 - 1 Pichler
691
Rank
197
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
574
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
56% (305-243)
Career Total W/L
56% (340-264)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jeremy Jahn | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:0 | 1:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (29/42) | 50% (19/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (14/29) | 89% (17/19) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 23% (3/13) | 63% (12/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (9/38) | 60% (25/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
Jeremy Jahn
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeremy Jahn | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (19/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (175/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 53 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 300.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (673/1070) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (462/673) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (196/397) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (46/103) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (442/1112) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Jeremy Jahn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Jeremy Jahn
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Jeremy Jahn
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Alec Deckers
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Jeremy Jahn
89%
(
57 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Jasza Szajrych
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jahn Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
