Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jenny Lim vs Madelief Hageman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lim vs Hageman analysis and find out who is favored!
Jenny Lim vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lim has won 47.37% of points on his second serve, while Hageman has won 45.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lim, in recent form, has won 58.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hageman has won 55.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.04% and 41.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lim has saved 51.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hageman has saved 47.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lim has won 59.52% of matches played (W/L 25/ 17), with Hageman winning 47.62% (W/L 30/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 26/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 86/ 81), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Lim has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 13/ 15), where as Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.79% of matches (W/L 29/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lim winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lim winning 2 and Hageman winning 1. The last match between Lim and Hageman was at the W15 Wanfercee-Baulet, 24-08-2022, First, Clay with Jenny Lim getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lim and Hageman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lim winning 1 times and Hageman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lim winning 0, and Hageman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lim has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.79 while Hageman has played against players with an average rank of 110.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lim has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hageman has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lim has converted 55.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hageman has converted 46.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lim 1 - 0 Hageman
547
Rank
547
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
54% (51-44)
Career Total W/L
51% (90-87)
73% (11-4)
YTD W/L
60% (15-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jenny Lim | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:0 | 2:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (61/97) | 57% (50/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (37/61) | 64% (32/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (12/36) | 43% (16/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (39/87) | 49% (48/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Jenny Lim
Player
Madelief Hageman
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
48 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jenny Lim | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (11/4) | 60% (15/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (22/8) | 60% (36/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 64% (169/95) | 55% (304/250) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:44 | 1:28:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 63.33 | 124.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (614/887) | 64% (851/1332) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (373/614) | 58% (497/851) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (144/273) | 49% (234/481) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (74/132) | 46% (85/185) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (443/849) | 47% (658/1395) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 63% (15/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (11/14) | 60% (15/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 30% (10/3) |
Jenny Lim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Jenny Lim
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Arabella Koller
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Camilla Zanolini
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Marie Weckerle
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Mirabelle Tahiri
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hannah Rylatt
Player
Jenny Lim
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Jenny Lim
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Iliev
Player
Jenny Lim
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
80%
(
16 of
20)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
48%
(
13 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
19
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Yasmine Kabbaj
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Dimitra Pavlou
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
48 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ioana Zvonaru
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Draginja Vukovic
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Madelief Hageman
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefania Bojica
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
58%
(
42 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
75
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Madelief Hageman
82%
(
91 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
111 of
145)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
75 of
145)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lim Vs Hageman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
