Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jennifer Brady vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brady vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Jennifer Brady vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brady has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brady, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brady has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brady has won 50% of matches played (W/L 6/ 6), with Hibino winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 187/ 109), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Brady has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Brady winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Brady winning 2 and Hibino winning 2. The last match between Brady and Hibino was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 06-03-2019, First, Hard with Jennifer Brady getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brady and Hibino have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brady winning 0 times and Hibino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brady winning 0, and Hibino 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brady has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.75 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 197.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brady has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brady has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brady 1 - 1 Hibino
234
Rank
13
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
60% (255-173)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-293)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$4,162,215
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jennifer Brady | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:29 | 1:32:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (78/145) | 63% (81/128) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (48/78) | 62% (50/81) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (34/67) | 47% (22/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (8/16) | 41% (7/17) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (56/128) | 43% (63/145) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Jennifer Brady
Player
Nao Hibino
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Jennifer Brady
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jennifer Brady | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (290/274) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 146.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1239/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (778/1239) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (276/603) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (102/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (815/1869) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 38% (13/5) |
Jennifer Brady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Jennifer Brady
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
15
Total Points Won
10
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Peyton Stearns
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Jennifer Brady
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Magda Linette
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Kimberly Birrell
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Jennifer Brady
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jennifer Brady
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
72 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
7
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(7) 0-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Jennifer Brady
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brady Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
