TBD
To Win
J. Ostapenko
To Win
Jelena Ostapenko vs Jasmine Paolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W W W
Form
L W W W W L W W W LH2H: Ostapenko 2 - 1 Paolini
They have played 7 sets in total, with Ostapenko winning 4 and Paolini winning 3. The last match between Ostapenko and Paolini was at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha, 12-02-2025, Third, Hard with Jelena Ostapenko getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 |
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 |
Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha(12-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
| Ostapenko | Stats | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (12-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (15-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 18 | Ranking | 6 |
| 5 | Highest Rank | 4 |
| 27 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 13 |
| 62% (403-248) | Career Total W/L | 59% (413-285) |
| $11,283,232 | Career Prize Money | $6,161,875 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Ostapenko
- / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jasmine Paolini
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jasmine Paolini
45%
(
42 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
6
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 36 | Games Won | 25 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:57:15 | Average Match Time | 0:57:15 |
| 49% (71/144) | 1st Serve % | 60% (75/126) |
| 76% (54/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (37/75) |
| 45% (33/73) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (23/51) |
| 61% (11/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 52% (66/126) | Return Points Win % | 40% (57/144) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Aryna Sabalenka
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Emma Navarro
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Dayana Yastremska
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cori Gauff
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Eva Lys
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (403/248) | Win/Loss | 59% (413/285) |
| 58% (884/632) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (914/723) |
| 54% (7458/6466) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7816/7156) |
| 55% (143/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (139/103) |
| 67% (114/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (216/125) |
| 65% (93/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (44/42) |
| 69% (53/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1590 | Aces Total | 516 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2911 | Total Double Faults | 1269 |
| 1:13:9 | Average Match Time | 1:14:24 |
| 349.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.89 |
| 56% (20267/36240) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25269/38895) |
| 65% (13239/20267) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (15055/25269) |
| 44% (6951/15959) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6374/13622) |
| 49% (2249/4595) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2298/4768) |
| 46% (16606/35921) | Return Points Win % | 46% (17299/37777) |
| 62% (59/36) | Slam W/L | 49% (31/32) |
| 54% (86/74) | Masters W/L | 53% (43/38) |
| 58% (18/13) | Cups W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 61% (138/90) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (103/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (53/27) | Challenger W/L | 64% (177/98) |
| 86% (49/8) | Futures W/L | 67% (51/25) |
| 62% (393/637) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (403/688) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 56% (74/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (74/137) |
| 61% (135/220) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (150/249) |
| 86% (382/330) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (373/321) |
| 14% (382/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (373/51) |
| 26% (269/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (324/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
