Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Kyle Kang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schulenburg vs Kang analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Kyle Kang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schulenburg has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kang has won 49.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schulenburg, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kang has won 53.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schulenburg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kang has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schulenburg has won 73.33% of matches played (W/L 11/ 4), with Kang winning 54.17% (W/L 13/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schulenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Schulenburg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4), where as Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 11/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schulenburg winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schulenburg winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Schulenburg and Kang was at the M15 Winston-Salem, 09-11-2022, First, I.hard with Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schulenburg and Kang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schulenburg winning 0 times and Kang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schulenburg winning 0, and Kang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schulenburg has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.27 while Kang has played against players with an average rank of 246.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schulenburg has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kang has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schulenburg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kang has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schulenburg 1 - 0 Kang
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
772
Rank
591
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
59% (38-26)
Career Total W/L
52% (43-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schulenburg VS Kang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Kyle Kang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (33/45) | 58% (38/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (27/33) | 50% (19/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (7/12) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (33/66) | 24% (11/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schulenburg VS Kang H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Kyle Kang
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Kyle Kang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (50/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 217 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (191/320) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (126/191) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (61/129) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (16/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (124/312) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Tim Handel
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Karl Friberg
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Guy Den Ouden
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Liam Gavrielides
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Axel Nefve
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Kang
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Karue Sell
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ozan Baris
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alessio Vasquez Gehrke
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Schulenburg Vs Kang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
