Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Clarke vs M. Imamura

Jay Clarke

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

186

C. Rank

497

153

Best Rank

331

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$213.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Masamichi Imamura

JPN

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

186

C. Rank

497

153

Best Rank

331

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$213.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Clarke 1 - 1 Imamura

They have played 4 sets in total, with Jay Clarke winning 2 and Masamichi Imamura winning 2. The last match between Masamichi Imamura and Jay Clarke was at the Pune Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Clarke	1
Imamura	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Pune Challenger(02-18-25)

Stats

Masamichi Imamura

Jay Clarke

(R1) New Delhi Challenger(02-11-25)

Stats

Jay Clarke

Masamichi Imamura

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura H2H Profile

J. Clarke	Stats	M. Imamura
$213,320	Career Prize Money	$0
58.61% (347-245)	Career Total W/L	58.06% (162-117)
1	Hard	1
16	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura Match Preview:

Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, both Clarke and Imamura have showcased commendable second serve performance. Clarke has triumphed in 49.96% of points on their second serve, while Imamura has accomplished a slight edge, winning 53.68%. This statistic holds a significant correlation with accurately predicting the outcome of matches.
Return Game Statistics: Scrutinizing their recent form, Clarke emerges as the victor in terms of winning their opponent's second serve points, securing an impressive 55.53%. Imamura, on the other hand, has maintained a solid performance, winning 50.87%. The statistics for first serve returns are also noteworthy: Clarke claims a 35.92% success rate, while Imamura stands at 32.18%. These figures strongly influence determining the favorite in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Analysis Under Pressure: When faced with breakpoints, Clarke has shown resilience, successfully saving an impressive 59.5%. Similarly, Imamura's ability to ward off pressure is commendable, with a save rate of 61.81%. Such statistics prove invaluable for those engaged in in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Assessing their performance over the past year, Clarke has triumphed in 63.75% of matches played, boasting an impressive win/loss ratio of 51/29. Imamura, not to be outdone, has achieved a marginally higher success rate of 64.37%, with a win/loss record of 56/31. These numbers present a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
Surface Specialization: When it comes to surface specialization, Clarke shines on clay courts, winning 66% of matches (146/74). Conversely, their efficacy on grass courts diminishes, with a mere 26% success rate (11/31). In contrast, Imamura excels on indoor hard courts, showcasing a remarkable win percentage of 67% (6/9). However, their performance falters on clay courts, with a 50% win rate (6/6).
Player Level: During the past year, Clarke has primarily participated in tournaments with a $10K level, such as Futures, Satellites, and ITF, triumphing in an outstanding 73.21% of matches (41/15). Imamura, similarly, has faced formidable opponents in these tournaments, emerging triumphant in an impressive 70.31% of matches (45/19). It is important to note that when comparing players' statistics to predict favorites, such assessments are contingent on the tournament level they have been competing in.
Head-to-Head Encounters: Clarke and Imamura have clashed on one previous occasion. In this encounter, Clarke emerged victorious, seizing the win while Imamura endured defeat. The duration of their sets totaled two, favoring Clarke, who conquered both sets. The last faceoff between Clarke and Imamura transpired at the New Delhi Challenger on 11-02-2025, on hard courts, with Clarke prevailing with an impressive 6-1, 6-4 triumph.
Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: When reflecting on their past head-to-head matches, the average duration between these competitors has settled at 1 hour, 14 minutes, and 13 seconds.
Predicting Deciding Sets: Throughout their encounters, Clarke and Imamura have engaged in zero deciding sets. Consequently, neither player has clinched victory in such situations. This information significantly aids in predicting the outcome if the match were to extend its course.
Head-to-Head Under Extreme Pressure: Notably, Clarke and Imamura have yet to reach any tiebreak situations in their head-to-head matches. None have been won by Clarke, nor by Imamura.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Clarke has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 399.16, demonstrating their ability to contend against formidable rivals. Imamura, too, has showcased resilience by competing against players with an average ranking of 431.91.
Deciding Set Performance Across Matches: In those instances where matches were pushed to a deciding set, Clarke has emerged victorious in 46% of these encounters within the last 12 months. Imamura, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly higher success rate, triumphing in 54% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide invaluable insight for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past performance serves as a valuable asset for predicting tennis matches, the ongoing events demand a thorough evaluation of current statistics. Such analysis becomes instrumental in gauging the prowess and form of players. For specific insights on the current event, please refer to the section below. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit exceptional performances at particular events, ultimately influencing their outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent times, Clarke has capitalized on 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities. Imamura has also showcased proficiency in converting these chances, successfully seizing 40.75% of their opponents' service games. Such statistics prove influential when considering in-game live betting tips during critical breakpoint situations.
If you possess an avid interest in models dedicated to predicting tennis matches, peruse this article. Warning: This article is tailored for statistics enthusiasts.

Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Clarke	Stats	M. Imamura
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
20	Games Won	18
12	Aces (Total)	6
7	Total Double Faults	4
1:25:27	Average Match Time	1:25:27
56% (59/105)	1st Serve %	61% (76/124)
71% (42/59)	1st Serve Win %	68% (52/76)
52% (24/46)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (22/48)
55% (6/11)	Break Pts Won %	56% (5/9)
40% (50/124)	Return Points Win %	37% (39/105)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Clarke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Braga Challenger - 29-09-2025
R1 Henrique RochaH. Rocha	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Lisbon Challenger - 22-09-2025
R1 Frederico Ferreira SilvaF. Ferreira	L	6-3 1-6 6-1	Stats
Targu Mures 2 Challenger - 15-09-2025
F Franco AgamenoneF. Agamenone	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
SF Miguel DamasM. Damas	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
QF Gabi Adrian BoitanG. Adrian	W	6-0 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Imamura Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Perth - 06-10-2025
QF Christian LangmoC. Langmo	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R2 Mustafa Ege SikM. Ege	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Joshua CharltonJ. Charlton	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
M25 Perth - 29-09-2025
R1 Leo VithoontienL. Vithoontien	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
M25 Takasaki - 15-09-2025
R1 Naoki TajimaN. Tajima	L	6-1 6-0	Stats

View All

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Clarke	Stats	M. Imamura
58.61% (347/245)	YTD Win/Loss	58.06% (162/117)
56.58% (770/591)	Sets Win/Loss	57.40% (357/265)
52.63% (6734/6062)	Games Win/Loss	53.33% (3094/2708)
59.82% (131/88)	Hard Win/Loss	58.59% (150/106)
67.45% (172/83)	Clay Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
46.48% (33/38)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.67% (6/3)
23.40% (11/36)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.28	Aces Per Game	0.15
1744	Aces Total	427
0.21	Double Faults Per Game	0.11
1316	Total Double Faults	311
1:38:11	Average Match Time	1:10:27
481.95	Average Opponent Rank	449.42
58% (22475/38638)	1st Serve %	65% (8682/13259)
68% (15295/22475)	1st Serve Win %	66% (5691/8682)
51% (8260/16163)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (2261/4577)
45% (1846/4140)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (645/1445)
41% (16117/38973)	Return Points Win %	42% (5662/13625)
24.00% (6/19)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
23.53% (4/13)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
49.26% (134/138)	Challenger W/L	40.00% (22/33)
73.45% (202/73)	Futures W/L	62.50% (140/84)
59% (340/572)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (161/277)
23% (3/13)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
52% (91/174)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (30/57)
57% (95/168)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (31/64)
87% (345/299)	1st Set Won, Won Match	90% (165/148)
13% (345/45)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	10% (165/17)
19% (247/47)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (114/14)