Jay Clarke vs Gonzalo Bueno Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Bueno has a slight edge in second serve points, winning 41.07%, compared to Clarke's 40.84% over the last six months. This narrow difference could be crucial in closely contested matches.
• Return Game Efficiency: Returning against the first serve, Bueno secures 32.48% of points, slightly outperforming Clarke's 29.22%. On second serves, Bueno again leads with 46.87% versus Clarke's 44.3%.
• Pressure Handling: When facing breakpoints, Bueno successfully saves 50.9%, outpacing Clarke’s 48.44%. This statistic can shift match odds under pressure.
• Overall Match Performance: Clarke exhibits a stronger overall win rate (67.05%) than Bueno (54.29%) over the past year, which may indicate better form or higher consistency across matches.
• Preferred Surface: Both players excel on clay courts, with Clarke showing superiority at 68% win rate compared to Bueno’s 56%.
• Match Level: Bueno contests mainly in higher-level tournaments than Clarke, potentially facing stronger opponents more frequently, reflected in the average rank of 274.41 versus Clarke’s 414.5.
• Deciding Sets: Bueno displays better performance in deciding sets, winning 65% compared to Clarke’s 45%, signaling greater resilience under tight conditions.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Recently, Bueno converts 37.2% of breakpoints, slightly more efficient than Clarke’s 34.06%.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

The matchup between Bueno and Clarke promises to be closely fought, with several stats offering potential insights. Bueno’s minor advantages in second serve points and return game efficiency might provide the needed edge in critical junctures.

Despite Clarke’s superior overall win rate and excellent performance on clay, Bueno’s ability to handle pressure and perform in deciding sets cannot be overlooked. The difference in players' competitive experiences, with Bueno facing tougher opponents, may also play a significant role in match dynamics.

Considering all factors, Bueno appears marginally more advantageous across key metrics. Given their composure in deciding sets and breakpoint conversion, Bueno is tentatively favored to emerge as the winner in this encounter.