A. Walton
To Win
J. M. Kubler
To Win
Jason Murray Kubler vs Dennis Novak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W L W
Form
W L W W L W W L L LHead To Head: Kubler 1 - 1 Novak
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kubler winning 3 and Novak winning 2. The last match between Kubler and Novak was at the Wimbledon - London, 01-07-2022, Second, Grass with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-3 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jason Murray Kubler | 1 |
| Dennis Novak | 1 |
Wimbledon - London(01-07-2022)
6
3
6
4
6
4
| Kubler | Stats | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (22-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (12-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 307 | Ranking | 367 |
| 63 | Highest Rank | 85 |
| 31 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 23 | Titles | 26 |
| 67% (436-213) | Career Total W/L | 62% (515-314) |
| $1,200,795 | Career Prize Money | $838,895 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Dennis Novak
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 27 | Games Won | 24 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:37:50 | Average Match Time | 1:37:50 |
| 68% (102/151) | 1st Serve % | 63% (92/145) |
| 77% (79/102) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (68/92) |
| 57% (28/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (24/53) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 37% (53/145) | Return Points Win % | 29% (44/151) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
133)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
58 of
85)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Rei Sakamoto
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
9
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Jarrod Joyce
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yuichiro Inui
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Dennis Novak
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Dennis Novak
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Dennis Novak
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
118)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Dennis Novak
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Timofey Skatov
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Pavlos Tsitsipas
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Dennis Novak
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Massimo Giunta
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
36%
(
21 of
58)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (436/213) | Win/Loss | 62% (515/314) |
| 64% (968/544) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (1160/781) |
| 55% (7855/6366) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9762/8555) |
| 66% (154/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (119/55) |
| 70% (243/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (277/167) |
| 38% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (92/78) |
| 65% (33/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 66% (27/14) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2104 | Aces Total | 2371 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1794 | Total Double Faults | 1668 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:5 |
| 502.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 508.35 |
| 62% (18772/30508) | 1st Serve % | 65% (28251/43759) |
| 71% (13403/18772) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (19383/28251) |
| 51% (5930/11735) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7780/15507) |
| 44% (1380/3143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1887/4491) |
| 40% (12338/30767) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17732/44342) |
| 51% (24/23) | Slam W/L | 59% (34/24) |
| 36% (4/7) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 47% (24/27) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (40/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (162/81) | Challenger W/L | 54% (184/156) |
| 75% (221/74) | Futures W/L | 77% (245/75) |
| 69% (417/608) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (500/796) |
| 48% (15/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 56% (112/201) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (155/278) |
| 57% (104/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (135/253) |
| 90% (415/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (506/435) |
| 9% (415/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (506/70) |
| 26% (234/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (323/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
