Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Jung vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jung vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Jung vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jung has won 53.91% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 51.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jung, in recent form, has won 55.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.04% and 26.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jung has saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 65.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jung has won 64.15% of matches played (W/L 34/ 19), with Sandgren winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.89% of matches (W/L 23/ 13), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 26/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jung winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jung winning 2 and Sandgren winning 2. The last match between Jung and Sandgren was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 14-07-2021, Second, Grass with Jason Jung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jung and Sandgren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jung winning 0 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jung winning 0, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 291.6 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 273.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jung has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jung has converted 43.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 32.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jung 1 - 1 Sandgren
271
Rank
114
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
56% (412-327)
Career Total W/L
56% (419-323)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
61% (11-7)
$350,585
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jason Jung | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 18 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:33:29 | 0:33:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) | 57% (29/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (29/33) | 66% (19/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (5/15) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (25/51) | 29% (14/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Jason Jung
Player
Tennys Sandgren
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Jung | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 61% (11/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 62% (28/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (64/52) | 54% (249/212) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.91 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 205 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:41 | 1:54:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 330.67 | 288 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (233/358) | 59% (854/1436) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (168/233) | 78% (669/854) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (69/125) | 51% (298/582) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (15/40) | 36% (45/125) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (148/383) | 35% (504/1426) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 58% (7/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jung Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
