Jason Jung vs Mats Moraing Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Jung vs M. Moraing

Jason Jung

TPE

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'6" (198 cm)

856

C. Rank

874

114

Best Rank

116

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

$150.8K

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Mats Moraing

GER

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'6" (198 cm)

856

C. Rank

874

114

Best Rank

116

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

$150.8K

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Jung 1 - 1 Moraing

They have played 6 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 3 and Mats Moraing winning 3. The last match between Mats Moraing and Jason Jung was at the Phoenix Challenger, 14-03-2022, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Mats Moraing getting the victory 6-2 3-6 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jung	1
Moraing	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Phoenix Challenger(03-14-22)

Stats

Mats Moraing

Jason Jung

(QF) Zhuhai Challenger(03-09-18)

Stats

Jason Jung

Mats Moraing

J. Jung vs M. Moraing H2H Profile

J. Jung	Stats	M. Moraing
$350,585	Career Prize Money	$150,765
55.35% (414-334)	Career Total W/L	59.34% (359-246)
1	Hard	1
8	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Jung vs M. Moraing Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jason Jung has won 46.12% of points on their second serve, while Mats Moraing has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jason Jung, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mats Moraing has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jason Jung has saved 52.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mats Moraing has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jason Jung has won 22.22% of matches played (W/L 2/7), with Mats Moraing winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26). Mats Moraing has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 88/56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 6/14).
Player level: In the last year, Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7), where as Mats Moraing has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jason Jung winning 1 times and Mats Moraing being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 3 and Mats Moraing winning 3.
The last match between Jason Jung and Mats Moraing was at the Phoenix Challenger, 14-03-2022, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Mats Moraing getting the victory 6-2 3-6 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:45.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Jason Jung and Mats Moraing have played a deciding set 2 times, with Jason Jung winning 1 times and Mats Moraing 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jason Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 330.33 while Mats Moraing has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jason Jung has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mats Moraing has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mats Moraing has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jason Jung vs Mats Moraing Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Jung vs M. Moraing H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Jung	Stats	M. Moraing
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	3
28	Games Won	27
12	Aces (Total)	20
5	Total Double Faults	12
1:53:45	Average Match Time	1:53:45
64% (110/171)	1st Serve %	53% (96/181)
72% (79/110)	1st Serve Win %	67% (64/96)
44% (27/61)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (43/85)
32% (7/22)	Break Pts Won %	54% (7/13)
41% (74/181)	Return Points Win %	38% (65/171)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

M. Moraing Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Sharm ElSheikh - 27-11-2023
R1 Boris ButulijaB. Butulija	L	7-5 1-0 ret.	Stats
M15 Sharm ElSheikh - 20-11-2023
SF Evgeny PhilippovE. Philippov	L	6-1 ret.	Stats
QF Marat Sharipov (RUS)M. Sharipov	W	w/o	Stats
R2 Niklas SchellN. Schell	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
R1 Tomas LanikT. Lanik	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Jung vs M. Moraing Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Jung	Stats	M. Moraing
55.35% (414/334)	YTD Win/Loss	59.34% (359/246)
54.67% (949/787)	Sets Win/Loss	58.21% (794/570)
51.99% (8605/7946)	Games Win/Loss	53.48% (6841/5951)
58.00% (308/223)	Hard Win/Loss	59.87% (94/63)
49.21% (31/32)	Clay Win/Loss	57.69% (135/99)
50.93% (55/53)	Indoor Hard W/L	63.92% (124/70)
43.48% (20/26)	Grass Win/Loss	30.00% (6/14)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.66
1949	Aces Total	4143
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.29
1621	Total Double Faults	1813
1:12:48	Average Match Time	1:3:3
565.62	Average Opponent Rank	561.33
63% (25533/40298)	1st Serve %	57% (17149/30036)
68% (17485/25533)	1st Serve Win %	77% (13196/17149)
51% (7548/14765)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (6286/12886)
40% (1594/3943)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1206/2808)
39% (16005/40933)	Return Points Win %	38% (11974/31390)
38.89% (14/22)	Slam W/L	34.78% (8/15)
18.18% (2/9)	Masters W/L	33.33% (1/2)
40.00% (2/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
46.25% (37/43)	Main Tour W/L	36.00% (9/16)
53.93% (240/205)	Challenger W/L	52.04% (140/129)
69.59% (119/52)	Futures W/L	70.53% (201/84)
57% (409/720)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (354/571)
9% (2/22)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	29% (2/7)
51% (122/241)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (103/196)
52% (113/218)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (103/174)
85% (416/352)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (345/304)
15% (416/64)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (345/38)
18% (331/61)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (259/57)