Prediction of Jasmine Paolini [6th] vs Jule Niemeier [121st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W W L
Form
L L W W L L L L W LH2H: Paolini 3 - 0 Niemeier
They have played 7 sets in total, with Paolini winning 6 and Niemeier winning 1. The last match between Paolini and Niemeier was at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart, 17-04-2025, Second, Clay with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 3 |
| Jule Niemeier | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
74 of
119)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
119)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 44 | Games Won | 29 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1:52:55 | Average Match Time | 1:52:55 |
| 70% (161/231) | 1st Serve % | 57% (147/258) |
| 62% (100/161) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (89/147) |
| 51% (36/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (44/111) |
| 46% (17/37) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (10/22) |
| 48% (125/258) | Return Points Win % | 41% (95/231) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jasmine Paolini vs Jule Niemeier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paolini 3 - 0 Niemeier
Editorial Prediction:
Over the past six months, the performance of second serves reveals that Paolini has won 43.31% of points, while Niemeier has managed 39.04%. This statistic often aligns closely with the predicted winner of upcoming matches. On the other hand, Niemeier has won 51.82% of her opponent's second serve points in the recent form, slightly edging out Paolini's 49.82%. When it comes to first serve returns, Paolini and Niemeier have figures of 30.62% and 29.69% respectively, which is crucial for determining the favored contender in this matchup.
Pressure situations are often pivotal in determining outcomes, and Paolini has saved 45.77% of breakpoints, compared to Niemeier's 44.67%, a key indicator for in-game betting. In terms of overall performance, Paolini boasts a winning percentage of 67.74% over the last year (W/L 42/20), while Niemeier stands at 45.83% (W/L 22/26), offering a comprehensive prediction metric for head-to-head encounters. Furthermore, considering their career surface statistics, both players excel on clay, with Niemeier slightly outperforming at 65% (W/L 127/67) compared to Paolini's 63% (W/L 214/124).
When analyzing player levels over the past year, Paolini has predominantly competed in the Masters series, achieving a win rate of 57.69% (W/L 15/11). Meanwhile, Niemeier has focused on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K level, where she has won 66.67% of her matches (W/L 8/4). This context is crucial when predicting the favorite. Their head-to-head history shows Paolini securing both prior encounters against Niemeier, claiming 4 out of 5 sets. Their most recent meeting was at the Transylvania Open, where Paolini emerged victorious 7-5, 7-5.
In matches between these two, the average duration has been approximately 2 hours, 6 minutes, and 13 seconds. When it comes to deciding sets in head-to-head matchups, Paolini has triumphed in their only encounter that reached this stage. Nevertheless, both have yet to face each other in a tiebreak situation. Considering their opposition over the last year, Paolini played against opponents with an average ranking of 87.84, whereas Niemeier faced those ranked 213.44 on average, highlighting a disparity in competition level.
Recent break point conversion rates show Niemeier with a slight edge, converting 34.31% of opportunities compared to Paolini's 32.14%, a subtle clue for live betting scenarios. In deciding set performances against all players over the past 12 months, Paolini's success rate stands at 50%, overshadowing Niemeier's 33%. When evaluating all the stats, it appears that Paolini has several advantages, positioning her as the likely winner of their upcoming encounter.
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cori Gauff
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Eva Lys
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Jule Niemeier
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
129%
(
58 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Jule Niemeier
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Jule Niemeier
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Eva Lys
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Jule Niemeier
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Jule Niemeier
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (413/285) | Win/Loss | 58% (213/156) |
| 56% (914/723) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (484/358) |
| 52% (7816/7156) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4159/3674) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 516 | Aces Total | 1301 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.54 |
| 1269 | Total Double Faults | 2055 |
| 1:14:24 | Average Match Time | 1:38:17 |
| 378.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 343.64 |
| 65% (25269/38895) | 1st Serve % | 56% (14014/24959) |
| 60% (15055/25269) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9267/13987) |
| 47% (6374/13622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4950/10983) |
| 48% (2298/4768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1453/3100) |
| 46% (17299/37777) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11258/24851) |
| 59% (403/688) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (208/359) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (74/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (38/72) |
| 60% (150/249) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (50/110) |
| 86% (373/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (225/193) |
| 14% (373/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (225/32) |
| 27% (324/87) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (144/20) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jasmine Paolini
View full predicted draw for Paolini in Madrid
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
