Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jasmine Paolini vs Clara Burel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paolini vs Burel analysis and find out who is favored!
Jasmine Paolini vs Clara Burel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paolini has won 47.5% of points on his second serve, while Burel has won 43.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paolini, in recent form, has won 54.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Burel has won 59.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.1% and 40.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paolini has saved 54.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burel has saved 47.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paolini has won 64.1% of matches played (W/L 50/ 28), with Burel winning 65.08% (W/L 41/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 203/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Burel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 72/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Paolini has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Burel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paolini winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paolini winning 2 and Burel winning 1. The last match between Paolini and Burel was at the BNP Paribas Poland Open - Warsaw, 28-07-2022, Second, Clay with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paolini and Burel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paolini winning 1 times and Burel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paolini winning 0, and Burel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paolini has played against opponents with an average rank of 135.76 while Burel has played against players with an average rank of 179.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paolini has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burel has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paolini has converted 54.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burel has converted 50.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paolini 1 - 0 Burel
13
Rank
13
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
44
Rank
44
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
58% (369-265)
Career Total W/L
59% (160-109)
64% (14-8)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$2,141,786
Career Prize Money
$1,267,550
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Clara Burel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:29 | 1:49:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (51/85) | 48% (38/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (30/51) | 66% (25/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (22/34) | 27% (11/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (43/79) | 39% (33/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-7(1) 6-0 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Clara Burel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
11 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Clara Burel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (14/8) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (32/19) | 52% (24/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (261/230) | 51% (212/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 58 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:5 | 1:41:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 152.86 | 143.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1067/1559) | 56% (759/1348) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (668/1067) | 62% (467/759) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (234/492) | 42% (248/589) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (91/163) | 48% (88/182) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (699/1553) | 47% (671/1429) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (8/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 56% (5/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sara Errani
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Volynets
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Tatjana Maria
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sorana Cirstea
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Clara Burel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Clara Burel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Katarina Zavatska
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Clara Burel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Xiyu Wang
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Clara Burel
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Eva Lys
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Clara Burel
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Paolini Vs Burel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jasmine Paolini
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clara Burel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
