Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jasmine Paolini vs Cindy Burger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paolini vs Burger analysis and find out who is favored!
Jasmine Paolini vs Cindy Burger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paolini has won 47.38% of points on his second serve, while Burger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paolini, in recent form, has won 55.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Burger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paolini has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paolini has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 51/ 27), with Burger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 205/ 121), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Burger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 283/ 180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Paolini has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Burger has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paolini winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paolini winning 2 and Burger winning 2. The last match between Paolini and Burger was at the Santa Margherita Di Pula, 06-10-2016, Second, Clay with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paolini and Burger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paolini winning 0 times and Burger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paolini winning 0, and Burger 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paolini has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.9 while Burger has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paolini has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paolini has converted 53.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paolini 1 - 1 Burger
13
Rank
13
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
134
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
58% (371-266)
Career Total W/L
59% (325-229)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,230,226
Career Prize Money
$44,173
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Cindy Burger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (77/121) | 64% (82/129) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (48/77) | 61% (50/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (21/44) | 32% (15/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (64/129) | 43% (52/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cindy Burger
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Jasmine Paolini
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Cindy Burger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (295/249) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:8 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.6 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1184/1707) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (746/1184) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (248/523) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (107/196) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (803/1750) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (16/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Jasmine Paolini
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sara Errani
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Volynets
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cindy Burger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Cindy Burger
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sinja Kraus
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Cindy Burger
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Jesika Maleckova
43%
(
40 of
92)
1st Serve %
39%
(
30 of
76)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
12 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
34%
(
22 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
31%
(
13 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
52%
(
33 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Marine Partaud
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sina Herrmann
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Bente Spee
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paolini Vs Burger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
