Jasmine Paolini vs Ashlyn Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 08:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Paolini vs A. Krueger

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paolini 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jasmine Paolini winning 2 and Ashlyn Krueger winning 0. The last match between Jasmine Paolini and Ashlyn Krueger was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 12-08-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Paolini | 1 |
Krueger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R3) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-12-25)
J. Paolini vs A. Krueger H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$8,519,140 | Career Prize Money | $1,512,233 |
60.00% (444-296) | Career Total W/L | 55.71% (161-128) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
14 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
71.88% (46-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.84% (21-22) |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
J. Paolini vs A. Krueger Match Preview:
- Paolini has demonstrated stronger second serve performance recently, winning 44.31% of points compared to Krueger's 38.98%.
- Both players show comparable skills in returning their opponents' second serves, with Paolini at 48.77% and Krueger at 48.24%, but Paolini has an edge in returning first serves at 35.16% versus Krueger's 30.68%.
- Under pressure, Paolini protects her serve slightly better by saving 48.01% of breakpoints against Krueger's 46.94%.
- Paolini has a stronger match win rate over the past year at 66.1% in comparison to Krueger's 52.73%.
- When it comes to surfaces, Paolini excels on clay with a 64% win rate, while Krueger performs best on grass, winning 58% of matches there.
- Is performance on the event's surface crucial? Although Paolini's clay expertise shines, Krueger could possess a slight advantage on grass.
- Paolini has faced more challenging opponents with an average rank of 65.19, compared to Krueger's 71.71, hinting at stronger competition experience.
- In match closers, Krueger edges ahead, winning 64% of deciding sets, compared to Paolini's 53%.
- Despite having similar breakpoint conversion rates, Krueger leads slightly at 43.48% against Paolini's 42.01%.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
Based on the analysis, Paolini emerges with notable advantages in match win percentages, second serve performance, and match experience against higher-ranked opponents. Her ability to return first serves more effectively adds to her edge.
Krueger, however, poses a threat with success in deciding sets and marginally superior breakpoint conversion. Additionally, Krueger's favorable statistics on grass surfaces must be noticed, especially depending on where the match is played.
While it could be a tight contest given Krueger's strengths in key areas, Paolini's performance trends suggest she may be the more likely candidate to clinch the victory in this upcoming match.
Jasmine Paolini vs Ashlyn Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Paolini vs A. Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
1:29:25 | Average Match Time | 1:29:25 |
63% (39/62) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/66) |
69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (21/36) |
61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
48% (32/66) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21/62) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Paolini Recent Matches Played
A. Krueger Recent Matches Played

J. Paolini vs A. Krueger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.00% (444/296) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.71% (161/128) |
56.48% (980/755) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.04% (361/307) |
52.40% (8334/7570) | Games Win/Loss | 51.47% (3214/3031) |
58.56% (154/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.19% (109/85) |
64.02% (226/127) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.84% (34/28) |
52.81% (47/42) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
48.57% (17/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.69% (15/11) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
563 | Aces Total | 772 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
1327 | Total Double Faults | 1193 |
1:15:36 | Average Match Time | 1:33:25 |
384.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 191.5 |
65% (27168/41689) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12255/19117) |
60% (16233/27168) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7759/12255) |
47% (6830/14517) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3037/6862) |
48% (2468/5123) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1056/2332) |
46% (18588/40586) | Return Points Win % | 44% (8569/19265) |
51.39% (37/35) | Slam W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
58.65% (61/43) | Masters W/L | 50.91% (28/27) |
57.89% (11/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
55.15% (107/87) | Main Tour W/L | 54.05% (40/34) |
64.36% (177/98) | Challenger W/L | 60.34% (70/46) |
67.11% (51/25) | Futures W/L | 61.11% (11/7) |
59% (433/729) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (157/285) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
55% (82/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (36/67) |
61% (159/262) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (50/93) |
86% (400/344) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (160/134) |
14% (400/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (160/25) |
28% (339/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (129/25) |