Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jarkko Nieminen vs Benjamin Becker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nieminen vs Becker analysis and find out who is favored!
Jarkko Nieminen vs Benjamin Becker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nieminen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Becker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nieminen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Becker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nieminen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Becker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nieminen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Becker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 202/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/ 32). Becker has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 67/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 19/ 47).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 9 times before with Nieminen winning 6 times. They have played 22 sets in total, with Nieminen winning 14 and Becker winning 8. The last match between Nieminen and Becker was at the Rakuten Japan Open - Tokyo, 30-09-2014, First, Hard with Benjamin Becker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nieminen and Becker have played a deciding set 4 times, with Nieminen winning 2 times and Becker 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 5 tiebreaks against each other with Nieminen winning 4, and Becker 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nieminen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Becker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nieminen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Becker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nieminen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Becker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nieminen 6 - 3 Becker
Ret.
Rank
13
High
42
Age
L
Plays
6
Total3
3
Hard2
0
Clay0
3
Indoor0
0
Grass1
Ret.
Rank
35
High
42
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
58% (574-409)
Career Total W/L
57% (441-338)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,231,200
Career Prize Money
$1,991,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Benjamin Becker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 6 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 14 | 8 |
| Games Won | 120 | 106 |
| Aces (Total) | 30 | 46 |
| DFs (Total) | 20 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:19 | 0:53:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (392/592) | 57% (323/567) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (285/392) | 73% (237/323) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (97/200) | 47% (114/244) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (22/53) | 46% (17/37) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (216/567) | 35% (210/592) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
33 of
77)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
17 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Benjamin Becker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Becker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Benjamin Becker
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
11
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
6
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Benjamin Becker
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Benjamin Becker
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
15
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Benjamin Becker
70%
(
86 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
39 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(10) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jonathan Gray
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Benjamin Becker
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximo Gonzalez
Player
Benjamin Becker
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Guido Andreozzi
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Benjamin Becker
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nieminen Vs Becker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
