Janice Tjen vs Lin Zhu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 11 May at 07:57 AM UTC

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Tjen vs L. Zhu

Janice Tjen

INA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

1.73m

C. Rank

166

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$235.5K

Career Money

$2.0M

Plays

Right-Handed

Lin Zhu

CHN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

1.73m

C. Rank

166

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$235.5K

Career Money

$2.0M

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Tjen 1 - 0 Zhu

They have played 2 sets in total, with Janice Tjen winning 2 and Lin Zhu winning 0. The last match between Janice Tjen and Lin Zhu was at the W35 Goyang, 11-05-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Janice Tjen getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tjen	1
Zhu	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(F) W35 Goyang(05-11-25)

Stats

Janice Tjen

Lin Zhu

J. Tjen vs L. Zhu H2H Profile

J. Tjen	Stats	L. Zhu
$235,544	Career Prize Money	$1,966,094
83.44% (126-25)	Career Total W/L	58.84% (446-312)
1	Hard	0
15	Titles	17
1	Total H2H Matches	0
76.92% (10-3)	YTD Win/Loss	41.18% (7-10)
1	YTD Titles	0

J. Tjen vs L. Zhu Match Preview:

In recent form, Zhu has a marked advantage on second serve performance, winning 42.6% of points compared to Tjen's 33.88%.
Regarding return game stats, Zhu surpasses Tjen by winning 49.44% of opponents' second serve points, while Tjen wins 47.2%.
Zhu also has the edge on first serve returns with 35.11% success versus Tjen's 30.74%.
How do these return stats impact match predictions? Players with better return stats, like Zhu, are often considered favorites.
Under pressure, Zhu excels by saving 52.83% of breakpoints, more than Tjen's 44.67%.
Over the last year, Tjen has a stellar win rate of 86.36%, considerably higher than Zhu's 52%.
Which surface favors Tjen more? Tjen is strongest on clay with a 93% win rate, while Zhu excels on hard courts with a 62% success rate.
Tjen has extensive success in Challenger/ITF events, winning 73.53% of such matches, a slight edge over Zhu's 64.29% success rate at a similar level.
Interestingly, Tjen faces generally lower-ranked opponents with an average rank of 416.7, compared to Zhu who faces opponents averaging a rank of 215.36.
If this match enters a deciding set, Tjen holds a significant advantage winning 67% of such sets, against Zhu's 20% success rate.
Regarding break point conversion, Zhu is more effective converting 47.96% of opportunities compared to Tjen's 34.71%.

Editorial Prediction (May 11, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match exhibits an intriguing clash between Tjen's overall match proficiency and Zhu's solid serve and return game metrics. While Zhu's recent return stats and breakpoint conversion percentages suggest a strong competitive edge under current conditions, these are contrasted by Tjen's outstanding overall win record in the last year.

Notably, Tjen displays a particular prowess in deciding sets, which could be crucial if the match remains closely contested. Moreover, Tjen's dominant clay performance offers an extra boost if the surface dynamics align in this tournament.

Nonetheless, considering the average level of competition each player has encountered and Zhu's superior ability to handle breakpoints and serve returns, Zhu seems poised to triumph in this matchup.

Janice Tjen vs Lin Zhu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Tjen vs L. Zhu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Tjen	Stats	L. Zhu
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
6	Aces (Total)	0
1	Total Double Faults	3
1:7:43	Average Match Time	1:7:43
61% (30/49)	1st Serve %	75% (40/53)
73% (22/30)	1st Serve Win %	45% (18/40)
42% (8/19)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (6/13)
67% (6/9)	Break Pts Won %	50% (2/4)
55% (29/53)	Return Points Win %	39% (19/49)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Tjen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chennai Open - Chennai - 27-10-2025
F Kimberly BirrellK. Birrell	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
SF Lanlana TararudeeL. Tararudee	W	7-6(6) 7-6(5)	Stats
QF Mia PohankovaM. Pohankova	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Linda FruhvirtovaL. Fruhvirtova	W	2-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Caroline WernerC. Werner	W	6-4 6-7(5) 6-2	Stats

View All

L. Zhu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang - 27-10-2025
R1 Alycia ParksA. Parks	L	6-3 2-1 ret.	Stats
Ningbo Open - Ningbo - 13-10-2025
QF Diana ShnaiderD. Shnaider	L	2-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Mirra AndreevaM. Andreeva	W	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Emma RaducanuE. Raducanu	W	3-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Wuhan Open - Wuhan - 06-10-2025
R1 Maya JointM. Joint	L	7-5 7-6(10)	Stats

View All

J. Tjen vs L. Zhu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Tjen	Stats	L. Zhu
83.44% (126/25)	YTD Win/Loss	58.84% (446/312)
79.51% (260/67)	Sets Win/Loss	56.60% (990/759)
63.53% (1817/1043)	Games Win/Loss	52.69% (8374/7518)
81.82% (108/24)	Hard Win/Loss	61.90% (377/232)
92.86% (13/1)	Clay Win/Loss	45.61% (26/31)
100.00% (5/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (24/18)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	38.00% (19/31)
0.27	Aces Per Game	0.11
382	Aces Total	877
0.23	Double Faults Per Game	0.19
316	Total Double Faults	1477
1:24:2	Average Match Time	1:7:14
343.71	Average Opponent Rank	499.81
65% (5280/8174)	1st Serve %	63% (23005/36604)
69% (3619/5280)	1st Serve Win %	62% (14239/23005)
52% (1503/2894)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (6330/13604)
50% (657/1315)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (2164/4411)
50% (4425/8867)	Return Points Win %	45% (16505/36296)
80.00% (4/1)	Slam W/L	48.61% (35/37)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	37.70% (23/38)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	69.23% (9/4)
81.82% (9/2)	Main Tour W/L	53.37% (95/83)
79.55% (70/18)	Challenger W/L	63.69% (207/118)
95.35% (41/2)	Futures W/L	70.64% (77/32)
84% (125/149)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (441/748)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (1/3)
64% (18/28)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (76/149)
69% (18/26)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (137/237)
94% (123/116)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (423/366)
5% (123/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (423/56)
36% (28/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (335/79)