Janice Tjen vs Ayano Shimizu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 May at 10:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Tjen vs A. Shimizu

INA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tjen 1 - 0 Shimizu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Janice Tjen winning 2 and Ayano Shimizu winning 0. The last match between Janice Tjen and Ayano Shimizu was at the W35 Andong, 21-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Janice Tjen getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tjen | 1 |
| Shimizu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Andong(05-21-25)
J. Tjen vs A. Shimizu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $235,544 | Career Prize Money | $118,625 |
| 83.44% (126-25) | Career Total W/L | 59.54% (287-195) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 76.92% (10-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
J. Tjen vs A. Shimizu Match Preview:
- How do both players perform on their second serve? Tjen has a slightly lower success rate at 34.58% compared to Shimizu's 36.04%.
- In return games, Shimizu excels by winning 52.88% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Tjen trails at 47.44%. On first serve returns, Shimizu also leads with 34.75% against Tjen's 31.66%.
- When facing breakpoints, Tjen demonstrates resilience by saving 45.68%, surpassing Shimizu's 39.93%.
- How successful have they been over the past year? Tjen boasts an impressive 85.92% win rate, overshadowing Shimizu's 63.24% success rate.
- Tjen's best performance surface is Clay, with a stellar 93% win rate, while Shimizu's best is also Clay but at a lower 63% win rate.
- In terms of match level, Tjen dominates the Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments with a 74.36% win rate, outperforming Shimizu's 61.4% in similar events.
- Against opponents, Tjen's adversaries had a slightly higher average rank of 402.38 compared to Shimizu's 407.59.
- If the match extends into a deciding set, Tjen has the edge with a 70% win rate versus Shimizu's 56%.
- Does break point conversion make a difference? Shimizu outshines here by converting 44.75% of opportunities, superior to Tjen's 35.85%.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing contest of strengths and weaknesses. Tjen appears formidable with a commanding win rate over the past year and shines particularly on Clay surfaces. Moreover, their ability to rally in critical moments, such as breaking points, further accentuates their competitive edge.
Conversely, Shimizu shows a slightly better field performance in second serve strength and return skills, exhibiting a solid capacity to seize breakpoints. Their proficiency in converting opportunities can be pivotal in close scenarios.
While Shimizu has impressive qualities, Tjen's consistency and proven performance in high-pressure situations suggest they possess the winning edge. Based on these factual insights, Tjen is most likely the favorite to secure a victory in this confrontation.
Janice Tjen vs Ayano Shimizu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Tjen vs A. Shimizu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:53:46 | Average Match Time | 0:53:46 |
| 61% (25/41) | 1st Serve % | 47% (16/34) |
| 80% (20/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (3/18) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 71% (24/34) | Return Points Win % | 32% (13/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Tjen Recent Matches Played
A. Shimizu Recent Matches Played

J. Tjen vs A. Shimizu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.44% (126/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.54% (287/195) |
| 79.51% (260/67) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.93% (624/472) |
| 63.53% (1817/1043) | Games Win/Loss | 52.54% (5158/4660) |
| 81.82% (108/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.19% (150/132) |
| 92.86% (13/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.38% (32/21) |
| 100.00% (5/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72.39% (97/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 382 | Aces Total | 117 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 316 | Total Double Faults | 1185 |
| 1:24:2 | Average Match Time | 1:19:26 |
| 342.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.18 |
| 65% (5280/8174) | 1st Serve % | 68% (18606/27370) |
| 69% (3619/5280) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (10751/18606) |
| 52% (1503/2894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3849/8770) |
| 50% (657/1315) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1805/3532) |
| 50% (4425/8867) | Return Points Win % | 48% (12914/27187) |
| 80.00% (4/1) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 81.82% (9/2) | Main Tour W/L | 23.53% (4/13) |
| 79.55% (70/18) | Challenger W/L | 57.85% (210/153) |
| 95.35% (41/2) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (69/23) |
| 84% (125/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (280/474) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (46/79) |
| 69% (18/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (80/132) |
| 94% (123/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (268/239) |
| 5% (123/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (268/29) |
| 36% (28/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (214/49) |