Prediction of Jane Sharp vs Edith Tough Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sharp vs E. Tough

Jane Sharp
 USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
0
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Edith Tough
 USA
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
0
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Sharp 2 - 0 Tough
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jane Sharp winning 4 and Edith Tough winning 0. The last match between Jane Sharp and Edith Tough was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 16-09-1932, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jane Sharp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Sharp | 2 | 
| Tough | 0 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R3) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-16-32)
Jane Sharp
6
6
Edith Tough
2
1
(R2) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-18-31)
Jane Sharp
6
13
Edith Tough
4
11
J. Sharp vs E. Tough H2H Profile
J. Sharp vs E. Tough Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jane Sharp has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Edith Tough has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jane Sharp, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Edith Tough has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jane Sharp has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Edith Tough has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jane Sharp has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Edith Tough winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jane Sharp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 83% (W/L 24/5), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 42% (W/L 42/57). Edith Tough has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 83% (W/L 6/14), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 11% (W/L 1/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jane Sharp has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Edith Tough has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jane Sharp winning 2 times and Edith Tough being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jane Sharp winning 4 and Edith Tough winning 0.
- The last match between Jane Sharp and Edith Tough was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 16-09-1932, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jane Sharp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jane Sharp has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Edith Tough has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jane Sharp has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Edith Tough has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jane Sharp has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Edith Tough has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jane Sharp vs Edith Tough Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Sharp vs E. Tough H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sharp 0%, Tough 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sharp 0%, Tough 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Sharp 0%, Tough 0%.
J. Sharp Recent Matches Played
E. Tough Recent Matches Played

J. Sharp vs E. Tough Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.02% (134/101) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.56% (17/47) | 
| 55.27% (278/225) | Sets Win/Loss | 28.46% (37/93) | 
| 52.61% (2436/2194) | Games Win/Loss | 39.32% (442/682) | 
| 58.82% (30/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 28.57% (10/25) | 
| 82.76% (24/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 92.86% (13/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 59.52% (25/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 30.00% (6/14) | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) | 
| 57% (128/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (15/59) | 
| 60% (33/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) | 
| 92% (123/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (16/13) | 
| 8% (123/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (16/3) | 
| 15% (102/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (44/2) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.23
W2
3.64
05:00 PM 02/11/25
PredictionW1
1.22
W2
4.25
02:30 AM 01/11/25
PredictionW1
1.83
W2
1.85
04:00 AM 01/11/25
PredictionW1
2.28
W2
1.55
10:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.9
W2
1.9
06:30 PM 02/11/25
PredictionW1
1.51
W2
2.55
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
31 Oct 2025
Sara Bejlek vs Panna Udvardy Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 1st November 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Daniil Medvedev vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Raphael Collignon vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Bratislava 2 Challenger – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Ben Shelton vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Raphael Collignon vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Bratislava 2 Challenger – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Shelton Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 14-7
H2H 5-6
H2H 6-4
18:00
H2H 5-2
Tennis Events This Week
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
M25 Brisbane
Australia












