Jan-Lennard Struff vs Stefanos Sakellaridis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Could second serve performance be a deciding factor? Stefanos Sakellaridis has a slightly better recent form with 44.88% of points won, compared to Jan-Lennard Struff’s 44.56%, which might give Sakellaridis a slight edge in this area.
• Who dominates in return games? Struff displays strength on second serve returns, winning 45.24% of his opponent’s points, while Sakellaridis manages 41.10%. Yet, Sakellaridis excels when returning first serves, securing 26.27% compared to Struff's 21.93%.
• How do these players handle breakpoints under pressure? Struff marginally leads with 55.70% of saved breakpoints, slightly above Sakellaridis at 54.48%, a valuable statistic for tight match situations.
• Looking at overall performance, Sakellaridis boasts a higher win rate in the past year, victorious in 67.09% of his matches, while Struff has won 42.86% – hinting at a more favorable head-to-head prediction for Sakellaridis.
• Analyzing surface preferences: Sakellaridis’ best performance is on Hard courts with a 61% win rate, and Struff performs best on Clay with the same win percentage.
• In terms of player level, Sakellaridis excels on the Futures/ITF circuits with a 74.36% win rate, contrasting with Struff’s 40.91% success rate on the Main tour.
• Who faces stronger opponents? Struff’s opponents have an average rank of 85.31, considerably higher than Sakellaridis’ opponents, who average a rank of 463.89.
• If this match reaches a deciding set, Sakellaridis displays resilience, winning 73% of deciding sets in the past year, compared to Struff’s 40% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (October 8, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match has intriguing dynamics with each player displaying different strengths. Stefanos Sakellaridis holds a slight edge in second serve performance and has demonstrated a notable ability to win first serve returns.

While under pressure, Jan-Lennard Struff slightly outperforms in saving breakpoints, which could prove crucial during tight moments. However, over the past year, Sakellaridis has shown superior overall match-winning capabilities, possibly attributed to competing in tournaments with opponents of a different caliber.

Surface preferences also lean slightly toward Sakellaridis for this match if played on Hard courts, which is juxtaposed with Struff’s comfort on Clay. Notably, if the match stretches to a final decisive set, Sakellaridis shows a marked ability to clinch victory.

Considering these factors, Stefanos Sakellaridis appears to be the more likely winner in this head-to-head encounter.