Jan-Lennard Struff vs Lorenzo Sonego Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Over the past six months, Sonego has been slightly more effective than Struff on second serves, winning 48.05% of these points compared to Struff's 44.56%.
• Return Game: While Sonego excels in first serve returns at 23.44%, Struff outperforms in capitalizing on his opponent's second serve, winning 46.21% of those points.
• Resilience Under Pressure: In recent months, Struff slightly edges out Sonego in saving break points, achieving a 61.67% success rate versus Sonego's 61.39%.
• Overall Performance: Sonego has won a higher percentage of his matches (45.1%) compared to Struff's 39.02% over the past year.
• Preferred Surface: Both players excel on clay, but Struff has a marginally higher win rate of 61% compared to Sonego's 59% on this surface.
• Tour Level Play: Their performance on the main tour is almost identical, with Sonego winning 44.44% of his matches and Struff 45.45%.
• Head-to-Head: With an equal record of 1 win each and an even split of 4 sets between them, both have shown capability against each other.
• Tiebreak Advantage: Sonego has been more successful in tiebreaks, winning the two they have contested.
• Opponent Caliber: Sonego has faced tougher competition on average, playing against opponents ranked around 82.33 compared to Struff's 101.9.
• Deciding Sets: Should the match reach a deciding set, Sonego has a better record in the last year, winning 47% of those scenarios compared to Struff's 36%.
• Break Point Conversion: Sonego has been more effective in capitalizing on break points, with a conversion rate of 29.63% compared to Struff's 25.56%.

Editorial Prediction (June 17, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the upcoming match between Sonego and Struff, there are several convincing indicators that suggest an advantage for Sonego. His slightly higher success rate on second serves and superior performance in converting break points suggest sharper play during critical moments.

Although Struff shows a marginal edge in break point defense and second serve returns, Sonego's consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents and his superior tiebreak record provide him with a distinct edge.

The players' nearly mirrored historical match-up does suggest a tight contest. However, Sonego's resilience in deciding sets further bolsters his prospect as the favorite.

Thus, considering the performance indicators and match conditions, Sonego is the likely candidate to win this upcoming match.