Jan Simonsson vs Ruben Hartig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance compare between the players? Simonsson has a current second serve win rate of 0%, while Hartig's is significantly higher at 39.39%.
• In recent return games, Hartig has won 50% of points on opponent's second serves, compared to Simonsson’s 0%. Moreover, Hartig wins 34.15% of first serve returns, while Simonsson again scores 0%.
• Under pressure, Hartig saves 50% of breakpoints, greatly outperforming Simonsson who has saved none.
• Looking at overall performance, Simonsson has a match win rate of 20% in the past year versus Hartig's 41.67%.
• Both players perform best on clay, with Hartig slightly leading in win percentage at 45% compared to Simonsson’s 33%.
• How does the level of competition affect their performance? Simonsson’s average opposition rank is 104.2, tougher than Hartig's average opponent ranked 199.79.
• In all deciding sets over the last 12 months, Simonsson hasn't claimed a win, while Hartig has a 29% success rate.
• Are break points significant in predicting this match? Hartig converts 50% of his break point opportunities, whereas Simonsson converts 0%.

Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):

The comparative analysis of recent performance metrics reveals several key insights into the upcoming matchup between Simonsson and Hartig. Hartig displays a clear advantage in winning crucial points, particularly with a striking 39.39% success rate on second serves compared to Simonsson's 0%. This is further reinforced by Hartig's superior return game and breakpoint conversion rates.

Analyzing pressure scenarios, Hartig shows resilience by saving 50% of break points, an area where Simonsson struggles with a 0% record. The performance under stress could be a decisive factor in critical match situations.

Considering surface preferences, both favor clay, but Hartig once again leads with a slightly higher win percentage. Additionally, Simonsson tends to compete against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting experience in facing stronger competition, yet Hartig's more positive win rate in deciding sets cannot be ignored.

Given these factors, Hartig is positioned as the likely winner for this encounter, backed by superior overall statistics and composure in pivotal moments.