Jan Hrazdil vs Matic Dimic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Hrazdil vs M. Dimic

Jan Hrazdil
CZE
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Matic Dimic
SLO
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hrazdil 1 - 0 Dimic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan Hrazdil winning 2 and Matic Dimic winning 1. The last match between Jan Hrazdil and Matic Dimic was at the M15 Vrhnika, 30-05-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jan Hrazdil getting the victory 6-0 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hrazdil | 1 |
| Dimic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Vrhnika(05-30-24)
Jan Hrazdil
6
3
6
Matic Dimic
0
6
4
J. Hrazdil vs M. Dimic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.34% (73-72) | Career Total W/L | 51.79% (101-94) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Hrazdil vs M. Dimic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jan Hrazdil has won 40.87% of points on their second serve, while Matic Dimic has won 40.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jan Hrazdil, in recent form, has won 49.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matic Dimic has won 39.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.66% and 32.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jan Hrazdil has saved 56.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matic Dimic has saved 51.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jan Hrazdil has won 52.46% of matches played (W/L 32/29), with Matic Dimic winning 50.00% (W/L 15/15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jan Hrazdil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 9/8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Matic Dimic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 76/68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Jan Hrazdil has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/27), where as Matic Dimic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 15/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jan Hrazdil winning 1 times and Matic Dimic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan Hrazdil winning 2 and Matic Dimic winning 1.
- The last match between Jan Hrazdil and Matic Dimic was at the M15 Vrhnika, 30-05-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jan Hrazdil getting the victory 6-0 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jan Hrazdil has played against opponents with an average rank of 145 while Matic Dimic has played against players with an average rank of 98.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jan Hrazdil has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matic Dimic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jan Hrazdil has converted 34.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matic Dimic has converted 30.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jan Hrazdil vs Matic Dimic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Hrazdil vs M. Dimic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:4:0 | Average Match Time | 2:4:0 |
| 72% (60/83) | 1st Serve % | 62% (58/93) |
| 63% (38/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (32/58) |
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (14/35) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 51% (47/93) | Return Points Win % | 43% (36/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hrazdil 43%, Dimic 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hrazdil 50%, Dimic 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Hrazdil 61%, Dimic 58%.
J. Hrazdil Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(5) 7-6(10) | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
M. Dimic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-1 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||

J. Hrazdil vs M. Dimic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.34% (73/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.79% (101/94) |
| 51.39% (166/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.69% (229/214) |
| 51.49% (1593/1501) | Games Win/Loss | 50.80% (2235/2165) |
| 52.94% (27/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.06% (24/23) |
| 49.33% (37/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (76/68) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 243 | Aces Total | 248 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 532 | Total Double Faults | 246 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 256.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 250.43 |
| 58% (3631/6225) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3823/6330) |
| 66% (2404/3631) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2387/3823) |
| 43% (1107/2594) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1136/2507) |
| 44% (260/590) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (267/635) |
| 41% (2466/6041) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2527/6244) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 51.43% (72/68) | Futures W/L | 52.06% (101/93) |
| 50% (71/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (101/195) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (16/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (18/44) |
| 39% (13/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 84% (76/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (94/85) |
| 16% (76/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (94/9) |
| 12% (69/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (101/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction03:30 PM 19/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-0
12:35
H2H 0-0
12:35
H2H 0-0
13:55
H2H 0-0
14:15
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal