Jan Choinski vs Paul Jubb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Jubb has won 47.08% of his second serve points, narrowly outperforming Choinski who has won 46.76%.
• Return Game Stats: Jubb has a slight edge in return stats, winning 44.32% of opponents' second serve points compared to Choinski's 41.2%. For first serve returns, Jubb also leads with 29.55% over Choinski’s 25.38%.
• Breaking Under Pressure: Jubb and Choinski show nearly identical break point saving abilities, with Jubb saving 58.17% and Choinski saving 58.2%.
• Yearly Performance Overview: Jubb has a marginal advantage in match wins, boasting a win rate of 51.02% compared to Choinski's 49.12% over the past year.
• Surface Strengths: Both players excel on clay; Jubb has a higher win percentage at 72% compared to Choinski's 62%. Choinski, however, struggles significantly more on grass with a 21% win rate, compared to Jubb’s 55%.
• Event Level Matches: Choinski has performed better in Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments in the past year, winning 52.08% of these matches, while Jubb has won 40%.
• Head-to-Head Record: Choinski dominates the head-to-head stats, winning all three encounters against Jubb. Could this psychological advantage play a role?
• Average Match Duration: Past matches have lasted an average of 1:40:40. Does this indicate a longer match favoring Choinski, who has had success in longer matches?
• Deciding Sets: Jubb is more successful in deciding sets overall, winning 64% compared to Choinski’s 53% over the last year.
• Break Point Conversion: Choinski has shown a superior ability to convert break points recently, at a rate of 37.33% versus Jubb’s 31.25%.

Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match presents an interesting comparison between Jubb and Choinski based on recent statistics.

While Jubb has a slight edge in second serve performance and return game stats, Choinski seems to have a psychological and tactical advantage, having consistently defeated Jubb in their head-to-head confrontations.

Choinski's better performance in events over $10K and his superior break point conversion rate could prove critical in determining the outcome of the match.

Although Jubb has demonstrated resilience in deciding sets generally, Choinski's dominance in their direct encounters might give him the crucial edge in high-pressure situations.

Considering all the factors, Jan Choinski appears to be the more likely winner in this upcoming match.