Jan Choinski vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Choinski vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Jan Choinski

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

125

C. Rank

151

125

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$291.4K

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

125

C. Rank

151

125

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$291.4K

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Choinski 1 - 0 Wong

They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan Choinski winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1. The last match between Jan Choinski and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Lugano Challenger, 06-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jan Choinski getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Choinski	1
Wong	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Lugano Challenger(03-06-24)

Stats

Jan Choinski

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

J. Choinski vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

J. Choinski	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$291,405	Career Prize Money	$538,970
59.15% (420-290)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
1	Indoor	0
18	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

J. Choinski vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jan Choinski has won 46.44% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jan Choinski, in recent form, has won 43.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.32% and 22.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jan Choinski has saved 54.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jan Choinski has won 59.70% of matches played (W/L 40/27), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jan Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 247/144), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 6/17). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Jan Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 38/22), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jan Choinski winning 1 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan Choinski winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1.
The last match between Jan Choinski and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Lugano Challenger, 06-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jan Choinski getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:44.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jan Choinski has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.72 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.05.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jan Choinski has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jan Choinski has converted 24.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jan Choinski vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Choinski vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Choinski	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	13
9	Aces (Total)	13
6	Total Double Faults	5
1:44:44	Average Match Time	1:44:44
60% (43/72)	1st Serve %	48% (43/90)
81% (35/43)	1st Serve Win %	84% (36/43)
55% (16/29)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (21/47)
38% (3/8)	Break Pts Won %	67% (2/3)
37% (33/90)	Return Points Win %	29% (21/72)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Choinski Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Maia Challenger - 24-11-2025
QF Daniel Merida AguilarD. Merida	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
R2 Frederico Ferreira SilvaF. Ferreira	W	6-2 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Kilian FeldbauschK. Feldbausch	W	6-1 7-6(5)	Stats
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Marko TopoM. Topo	L	7-6(3) 6-4	Stats
Moselle Open - Metz - 03-11-2025
R1 Lorenzo SonegoL. Sonego	L	4-6 6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Choinski vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Choinski	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
59.15% (420/290)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
57.00% (940/709)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
52.97% (8176/7260)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
53.10% (60/53)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
63.17% (247/144)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
58.47% (107/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
26.09% (6/17)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.27	Aces Per Game	0.52
1999	Aces Total	1687
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
1000	Total Double Faults	603
1:22:19	Average Match Time	1:31:40
481.05	Average Opponent Rank	371.21
65% (26728/40964)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
68% (18153/26728)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
52% (7350/14236)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
43% (1806/4157)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
40% (16549/41090)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
31.58% (6/13)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
33.33% (1/2)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
38.71% (12/19)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
55.17% (176/143)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
66.57% (225/113)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
59% (407/689)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
45% (5/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
51% (104/202)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
54% (123/226)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
88% (398/352)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
12% (398/46)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
22% (311/67)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)