Jamie Loeb vs Makoto Ninomiya Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Ninomiya analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Makoto Ninomiya Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.87% of points on his second serve, while Ninomiya has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ninomiya has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 54.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ninomiya has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Ninomiya winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Ninomiya has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 110/ 99).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Ninomiya has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Loeb winning 1 and Ninomiya winning 2. The last match between Loeb and Ninomiya was at the Toyota, 16-11-2016, First, Carpet with Makoto Ninomiya getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Ninomiya have played a deciding set 1 times, with Loeb winning 0 times and Ninomiya 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Ninomiya 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.1 while Ninomiya has played against players with an average rank of 212.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ninomiya has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ninomiya has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 0 - 1 Ninomiya
11
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
868
Rank
280
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
55% (294-242)
Career Total W/L
54% (169-142)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$9,250
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jamie Loeb | Makoto Ninomiya |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 15 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:5:0 | 2:5:0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (55/106) | 59% (68/115) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (42/55) | 63% (43/68) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (24/51) | 60% (28/47) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 36% (4/11) |
Return Points W% | 38% (44/115) | 38% (40/106) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 4-6 6-4 |
Makoto Ninomiya
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
68 of
115)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
106)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
60%
(
28 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jamie Loeb | Makoto Ninomiya |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
Aces Total | 73 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:18 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 344.04 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (855/1546) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (579/855) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (343/690) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (725/1594) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Makoto Ninomiya Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Alexandra Yepifanova
Player
Makoto Ninomiya
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Xiyu Wang
Player
Makoto Ninomiya
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Makoto Ninomiya
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
18%
(
3 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Makoto Ninomiya
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Quinn Gleason
Player
Makoto Ninomiya
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Makoto Ninomiya
Player
Maya Battle
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Makoto Ninomiya
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more