Jamie Loeb vs Jacqueline Cako Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Cako analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Jacqueline Cako Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.87% of points on his second serve, while Cako has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cako has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 54.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cako has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Cako winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Cako has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 51/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Cako has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Loeb winning 3 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Loeb winning 7 and Cako winning 3. The last match between Loeb and Cako was at the Chicago, 02-09-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Cako have played a deciding set 2 times, with Loeb winning 1 times and Cako 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 1, and Cako 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.1 while Cako has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cako has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cako has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 3 - 1 Cako
11
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
172
High
32
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
55% (294-242)
Career Total W/L
50% (222-222)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$51,832
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jamie Loeb | Jacqueline Cako |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
Sets Won | 7 | 3 |
Games Won | 54 | 40 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 12 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:49 | 1:27:49 |
1st Serve % | 50% (113/228) | 57% (146/257) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (68/113) | 62% (90/146) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (65/115) | 42% (47/111) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (17/36) | 55% (12/22) |
Return Points W% | 47% (120/257) | 42% (95/228) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-3 6-2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Jacqueline Cako
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Jacqueline Cako
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
3-6 6-1 7-5 |
Jacqueline Cako
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jamie Loeb | Jacqueline Cako |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
Aces Total | 73 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:18 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 344.04 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (855/1546) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (579/855) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (343/690) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (725/1594) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jacqueline Cako Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Astra Sharma
Player
Jacqueline Cako
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Jacqueline Cako
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Brynn Boren
Player
Jacqueline Cako
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
119)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Charlotte Chavatipon
Player
Jacqueline Cako
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jacqueline Cako
Player
Monika Kilnarova
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marcela Zacarias
Player
Jacqueline Cako
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more