Jamie Loeb vs Asia Muhammad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Muhammad analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Asia Muhammad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 44.8% of points on his second serve, while Muhammad has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 54.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Muhammad has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 56.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muhammad has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 46.3% of matches played (W/L 25/ 29), with Muhammad winning 53.85% (W/L 14/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26), where as Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 11/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Loeb winning 4 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Loeb winning 8 and Muhammad winning 7. The last match between Loeb and Muhammad was at the Volvo Car Open - Charleston, 03-04-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Asia Muhammad getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Muhammad have played a deciding set 3 times, with Loeb winning 3 times and Muhammad 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 1, and Muhammad 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.74 while Muhammad has played against players with an average rank of 213.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muhammad has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muhammad has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 4 - 2 Muhammad
11
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
307
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
4
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
427
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
14
Total
0
Mast
13
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
55% (289-239)
Career Total W/L
54% (316-270)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$286,274
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jamie Loeb | Asia Muhammad |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
Sets Won | 8 | 7 |
Games Won | 69 | 64 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 25 | 23 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:22 | 1:26:22 |
1st Serve % | 51% (194/379) | 56% (210/374) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (122/194) | 62% (131/210) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (95/185) | 42% (69/164) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (22/52) | 43% (17/40) |
Return Points W% | 47% (174/374) | 43% (162/379) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Jamie Loeb
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
6-1 6-2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Asia Muhammad
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
7-5 3-6 6-2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Asia Muhammad
48%
(
46 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
4-6 7-6(7) 6-1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Asia Muhammad
56%
(
64 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
51 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
0-6 6-2 6-3 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Asia Muhammad
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jamie Loeb | Asia Muhammad |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (178/151) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
Aces Total | 52 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:52 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 410.6 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (528/964) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (364/528) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (205/436) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (63/141) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (482/1062) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Jamie Loeb
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
38%
(
14 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
15 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
SF |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more