Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Loeb vs Amanda Anisimova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Anisimova analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Amanda Anisimova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.87% of points on his second serve, while Anisimova has won 46.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Anisimova has won 55.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.9% and 36.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 54.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anisimova has saved 62.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Anisimova winning 55.56% (W/L 5/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Anisimova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 47/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Anisimova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loeb winning 2 and Anisimova winning 0. The last match between Loeb and Anisimova was at the Stockton, 21-07-2017, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Anisimova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loeb winning 0 times and Anisimova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Anisimova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.1 while Anisimova has played against players with an average rank of 41.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anisimova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anisimova has converted 49.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Anisimova
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
238
Rank
21
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
55% (294-242)
Career Total W/L
62% (145-88)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
63% (5-3)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$3,293,931
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Amanda Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (23/53) | 64% (41/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (19/23) | 56% (23/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 43% (10/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/64) | 32% (17/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Amanda Anisimova
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Amanda Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 63% (5/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) | 65% (11/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) | 54% (84/73) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:18 | 1:28:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 344.04 | 38.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (855/1546) | 64% (357/556) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (579/855) | 61% (219/357) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (343/690) | 47% (93/199) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/195) | 49% (31/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (725/1594) | 45% (225/504) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 63% (5/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Anisimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Amanda Anisimova
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
126)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Alize Cornet
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Amanda Anisimova
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Amanda Anisimova
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Amanda Anisimova
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Amanda Anisimova
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Loeb Vs Anisimova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
